I’m Not Totally Sure Where This Came From…
December 30, 2007 at 9:01 pm | Posted in Don Mattingly | 1 CommentExcept that it was taken in 2003. Donny and the Dodgers. Just sounds good, doesn’t it?

Happy New Year, folks. Here’s to an uber-successful 2008, both for the Dodgers and MSTI.
Can’t it be Opening Day.. tomorrow?
How I Became a Dodger Fan
December 23, 2007 at 10:56 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | 3 CommentsSo I’m already breaking the holiday cease-fire, but I’ve been struck by inspiration, in the form of a 20-year-old t-shirt. Oh, and booze. Plenty of that, too. (Caution: may contain actual feelings and little sarcasm. Proceed at own risk.)

This, friends, is what awaited me, hung on the back of a closet door, as I visited the parents for the holidays. This is the actual t-shirt that changed my life in 1987 or so. For you see, unlike many of you I am not a native Left Coaster, and I did not grow up with any sort of Dodger family tradition, as I imagine so many of you have.
No, I grew up in New Jersey in the 80s, and when I became aware of baseball, the Yankees were completely and totally unwatchable, Don Mattingly aside. Think Ed Whitson, Alvaro Espinoza, and Mike Pagliarulo, and you’ll know what I mean. The Mets? Well, the Mets were good, but I just had no connection with them.
So there I was, a baseball fan, with no team. But when I was 6 years old, I was able to sign up for tee-ball. And as luck would have it, I was assigned to the “Dodgers” – by which I mean, my royal blue screen-printed shirt just happened to say “Dodgers” on it. (Sidenote: what’s with all the kids leagues now having legit, MLB-replica uniforms? At 26, I shouldn’t sound like a grumpy old man just yet. But still. Back in my day, we had screen-printed t-shirts, mesh caps, and that’s how we liked it! P.S., stay off my lawn.) In my second year, once again – a Dodger.
Of course, my second year just so happened to be 1988. Which, as you may remember, was a relatively decent year for the Dodgers, as far as seasons go. Being a 7 year old, wearing the same shirt as the team that just won it all – and really, not knowing any better, for in retrospect I suppose I was just being what I despise the most (a frontrunner) – I was hooked. Somehow I ended up with an Orel Hershiser poster on my wall, and that was that. I vividly remember the next year, 1989, reading the sports page on the living room floor and running up to my dad being all excited that the Dodgers had moved up from 5th to 4th place near the end of the year. At which point I imagine my dad laughed at me, because, well, I know I would have. I also avidly remember collecting Dodger baseball cards – sure, there were the Hershisers, Scioscias (pre-illness), and Hatchers, but I mainly remember the Jeff Hamiltons, Mike Davises, Tracy Woodsons, and Brian Traxlers. (Geez, did that 89-90 group suck.)
Finally, three years later, the Dodgers called up another kid from the East, also named Mike, who also had a last name which started with a P and ended with “is Italian”, and was all but unwanted at first until he had to force his way onto teams (hey, I know that feeling! ow, my pride!). For an 11-year-old, that’s pretty much the pinnacle of life. And there you go. Dodger fan for good.
So there you have it – not that you asked for it. It’s amazing to me that something that means so much to me (mostly likely, far too much) was brought about largely by a blue t-shirt that could have just as easily read Cubs, Mets, or Braves. Or, god help us all, a black one reading Giants.
Just think – I could be writing Kirt Manwaring’s Tragic Illness right now. The horror… the horror.
We now return to our regularly scheduled holiday hangover.
Merry Ludachristmas
December 22, 2007 at 2:11 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | 2 CommentsOr Happy Festivus, if you prefer.
As you may – or, far more likely, may have not – noticed, the Illness has been a little slow lately. I choose to blame that on the unholy marriage of one too many holiday parties with open bars and the utter lack of Dodger news since Kuroda-san came on board. Not to mention, most front offices completely shut down for the week between Xmas and New Year’s, so it’s not like we’re going to be seeing a huge influx of Dodger news in the next few days.
So I’m just going to go ahead and make it official – thanks to having to visit far too many relatives over the next few days, the Illness is taking a holiday break. Seeing as how infrequently we’ve been posting anyway lately, this may not actually lead to less posting than usual. But we promise to improve that or your money back! We’ll be back next week.
In the meantime, my holiday wishes for the Dodgers, now that Jones and Kuroda are in the fold:
1) Trade Juan Pierre.
That is all.
Happy holidays. Smell ya later.
Gary Bennett, Come On Down
December 17, 2007 at 2:33 pm | Posted in Gary Bennett | 2 CommentsDODGERS SIGN BENNETT TO ONE-YEAR DEAL
Veteran Catcher to backup Russell Martin in Los Angeles
LOS ANGELES – The Los Angeles Dodgers announced today that they have signed free agent catcher Gary Bennett to a one-year contract, according to Dodger General Manager Ned Colletti.
“Gary provides us with a veteran catcher who can spell Russell from time to time,” said Colletti. “ He has been a member of some very good teams and the fact that he has spent his entire Major League career in the National League is also something we found to be beneficial.”Bennett, 35, spent the last two seasons as the primary backup catcher to Yadier Molina in St. Louis and hit .252 with two homers and 17 RBI in 2007. Over his 12-year career, Bennett has 21 home runs, 188 RBI, 73 doubles and a .242 career average. The Illinois native was drafted in 1990 by Philadelphia and has spent his entire career in the National League, playing for the Phillies, Mets, Rockies, Padres, Brewers, Nationals and Cardinals.
Last year, Bennett hit .314 following the All-Star break, including .400 (8-for-20) in the month of September and closed the season on a 7-for-11 tear (.636). The veteran also batted .313 with runners on base, .333 with runners in scoring position and two out and .383 from the seventh inning on.
In 2002, Bennett turned in his best season, batting .265 with four homers and 26 RBI while playing in 90 games. The next year, he established career highs with 96 games played, 307 at-bats and 42 RBI. The six-foot, right-handed backstop matched his career high with four home runs during the 2006 campaign.
Bennett has appeared in two playoff series, seeing action in the 2006 National League Division and League Championship Series, during the Cardinals’ march to a World Series title that season.
Well. He’s not much of a hitter. And I’d really have preferred Mike Lieberthal back. However, he’s Russell Martin’s backup – so whether that’s Bennett, Lieberthal, or 65 year old Johnny Bench, if he’s playing more than once a week we’re screwed either way.
Nuts and Gum, Together at Last!
December 15, 2007 at 11:06 am | Posted in Mark Hendrickson | 6 CommentsCats and dogs, living together! (Yeah, I’m really expecting only the SoSG guys to find that title funny.) We have reached the endtimes – because I’m advocating that I wish the Dodgers had been able to keep Mark Hendrickson around. Trust me – as much as you can’t believe you’re reading this post, I can’t believe I’m writing it about 200 times more.
That’s right, I’m saying the Dodgers should have kept Mark Hendrickson around. As a pitcher, even!
Tony Jackson explains,
The Dodgers might have severed ties with left-handed reliever Mark Hendrickson, declining to offer him a contract before the deadline and thus rendering him a free agent. But the club still can re-sign him, and the move was made simply to avoid going through the arbitration process with Hendrickson, who went 4-8 with a 5.21 ERA this season while making $2.925 million.
As a five-plus player, Hendrickson stood to make between $3.5 million and $4 million through arbitration.
“We discussed with his agent (Joe Urbon) bringing him back at a different rate of pay, and he declined,” Colletti said. “We can still bring him back if the situation lends itself to both of us.”
Now, at first, I completely agree with Colletti; the idea of giving Lurch a $1.5-$2 million raise is a pretty distasteful one. Especially because most Dodger fans remember him being “dreadful”, “awful”, and “terrible”, in no particular order. And they’re right: a 5.21 ERA last year, following a 4.68 ERA after being traded to LA in 2006 aren’t exactly stats to hang your hat upon. Plus, with Penny, Lowe, Billingsley, Kuroda (we hope! what’s the holdup?), Schmidt, Loaiza, and the 7-headed minor league monster of McDonald/Kuo/Elbert/Kershaw/Stults/Houlton/CH Park, it’s not like there’s a starting spot open anyway for an overpaid, ineffective pitcher.
I agree with all of this. 
Yet I still want to pay Mark Hendrickson millions to be an employee of the Los Angeles Dodgers. You know why? Because even though he’s a terrible, terrible starting pitcher.. he’s a surprisingly effective relief pitcher. Check it out:
Mark Hendrickson, 2006
As a SP: 4.44 ERA. .276 BA against.
As a RP: 0.84 ERA. .158 BA against.
As a starter in 2006, he was mediocre at best. Those numbers as a starter would actually be worse if they were only from his time in LA, as after being traded his ERA jumped nearly a full run from what it was in Tampa Bay (3.81 to 4.68), but I couldn’t find splits that had starting and relieving from only in LA. He only pitched 10.2 innings in relief after finally losing his starting spot, but he was sparkling. Small sample size or not, giving up 1 ER in 10.2 innings, and striking out more than a batter per inning (12 in 10.2) after just getting just more than half a batter per inning starting (87 in 154 IP) is a pretty dramatic turnaround. It wouldn’t be the first time we’ve seen a guy do dramatically better when he knows he only has to exert himself for an inning or two rather than trying to pace himself, right?
Did we see the same thing in 2007?
Mark Hendrickson, 2007
As a SP: 6.13 ERA. .321 BA against.
As a RP: 3.69 ERA. .240 BA against.
Ugh, I’d forgotten just how brutal he was when pressed into service as a starter this past season. But once again, definite improvement when used as a reliever. This time the IP were closer (76.1 as a starter compared to 46.1 as a reliever), and yet again, the K rate improved markedly. Nearly a batter per inning as a reliever (41 in 46.1 IP) compared to quite a bit less as a starter (51 in 76.1).
As long as we never, ever, even in case of emergency, allow him to start again, that’s a lot of value there. He seems like a fantastic long reliever, who can give you 2-3 effective innings when your starter can’t make it past 5, and behind a pen that’s so fantastic in the late innings with Saito/Broxton/Beimel, that’s a pretty nice chip to have.
Is it worth $4 million? Well, that remains to be seen. But with the state of pitching out there right now, don’t be the least bit surprised if some GM with an itchy trigger finger is dumb enough to give him a $10 million contract over 2 years to come in and be a (terrible) starter.
Let’s Play the Blame Game
December 13, 2007 at 9:06 am | Posted in live blog, steroids | 2 Comments2:42 pm EST: Oh, and in the interest of fairness: Nomar, not on the final list. Sorry, Nomar. I just love using that picture.
2:23 pm EST: Mitchell’s still giving his press conference and zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz… oh, sorry. This guy is about as interesting as baseball where all the players aren’t juicing. Just kidding. Anyway, we’re cutting the live blogging deal a little short, because this report continues to be 409 pages long, and I’m sure we’re all more interested in sorting through it. It’s pretty good, though: there’s actually checks that the players wrote for drugs. If you haven’t checked it out yet, go here-ish: http://files.mlb.com/mitchrpt.pdf
One final comment, Mitchell is saying that everyone shares blame – players, the union, and MLB itself. I’m glad he’s not going to let Selig off the hook here.
2:04 pm EST: Well the report is out, and the hair is flying. This thing is 409 pages long! Christ. More Dodgers involved: Kevin Brown, Paulie LoDuca. No shock there.
1:54 pm EST: ESPN legal analyst Roger Cossack implicates Jason Priestly! I knew he needed some help in order to get all those 90210 hotties.
Sure, he probably meant to say Jason Grimsley, but this is way more fun.
1:45 pm EST: 15 minutes until Sen. Mitchell speaks and… wait… Jose Canseco is there? At the presser? Oh god, this is going to be a bigger circus than I thought.
1:20 pm EST: Nomar, you’ve been implicated in the Mitchell Report for using illegal steroids. How do you respond?

1:08 pm EST: Just so we’re all on the same page here, whenever you hear anyone – exec, player, coach, media, anyone – say they were completely unaware of the steroid issue until about 2002 or so? Yeah, they’re full of shit. The Washington Post‘s Thomas Boswell wrote a story about Jose Canseco being on steroids in 1988. Canseco was so upset he threatened to sue; he didn’t, of course, because as we all know, he was full of more juice than a Florida orange grove.Just saying: don’t believe them when they say they didn’t know.
1:04 pm EST: This just in: Tommy Lasorda has tested positive for dangerously high levels of rigatoni, a performance-enhancing starch. When reached for comment, Tommy replied: “MORE!”
12:45 pm EST: While I can’t reiterate enough how much hearsay this all could be, apparently one of the big reason Clemens is on the list is because his supplier, a trainer, gave him. And that he met the trainer when he went from Boston to Toronto in 1997.
Hmmmmm.
1995, Boston: 4.18 ERA, 1.436 WHIP
1996, Boston: 3.63 ERA, 1.327 WHIP
1996-97, winter: goes to Toronto, meets Captain Steroids
1997, Toronto: 2.05 ERA, 1.030 WHIP, Cy Young winner
1998, Toronto: 2.65 ERA, 1.095 WHIP, Cy Young winner
Well. That might just check out.
12:41 pm EST: Headline of an article on the Denver Post right now: “Mitchell report puts game on pins, needles.”
Needles. Nice. The best part? Reading through the rest of the article, that appears to not even be a pun.
12:37 pm EST: Peter Gammons is making a whole hell of a lot of sense on ESPN right now. “Why did the sport have to drag this out and essentially besmirch the sport and the players?”
Good question, Pete.
12:03pm EST: Well, the first ”preliminary” list is out, or so says lovemyteam.com.
Brady Anderson, Manny Alexander, Rick Ankiel, Jeff Bagwell, Barry Bonds, Aaron Boone, Rafael Betancourt, Bret Boone, Milton Bradley, David Bell, Dante Bichette, Albert Belle, Paul Byrd, Wil Cordero, Ken Caminiti, Mike Cameron, Ramon Castro, Jose and Ozz ie Canseco, Roger Clemens, Paxton Crawford, Wilson Delgado, Lenny Dykstra, Johnny Damon, Carl Everett, Kyle Farnsworth, Ryan Franklin, Troy Glaus, Rich Garces, Jason Grimsley, Troy Glaus, Jua n Gonzalez, Eric Gagne, Nomar Garciaparra, Jason Giambi, Jeremy Giambi, Jose Guillen, Jay Gibbons, Juan Gonzalez, Clay Hensley, Jerry Hairston, Felix Heredia, Jr., Darren Holmes, Wally Joyner, Darryl Kile, Matt Lawton, Raul Mondesi, Mark McGwire, Guillermo Mota, Robert Machado, Damian Moss, Abraham Nunez, Trot Nixon, Jose Offerman, Andy Pettitte, Mark Prior, Neifi Perez, Rafael Palmiero, Albert Pujols, Brian Roberts, Juan Rincon, John Rocker, Pudge Rodriguez, Sammy Sosa, Scott Schoenweiis, David Segui, Alex Sanchez, Gary Sheffield, Miguel Tejada, Julian Tavarez, Fernando Tatis, Maurice Vaughn, Jason Varitek, Ismael Valdez, Matt Williams and Kerry Wood.
Well then. Remember, this is “preliminary” – and even more important, I doubt there’s solid proof about all of these guys. Just heresay and allegations, I’d think, though that won’t stop the court of public opinion.
Initial thoughts are very few surprises at most of those names. The Dodgers seem to get off pretty lightly, except for Eric Gagne. Which, I mean, come on. Behind Brady Anderson and the McGwire/Bonds/Sosa trifecta, he was pretty high on my suspected list all along. Failed starter becomes best closer ever for 3 years becomes injury prone nightmare? He was juicing? NO!!
11:15am EST: Today’s the big day! The day that every baseball fan dreams of. No, not Opening Day. No, not winning the World Series. No, not even that great Hot Stove day where your team signs for or trades for its next superstar.
No, today is Super Steroid Finger Pointing Day! Ahh, memories, just like when I was a kid. Back then, players didn’t fool around with “HGH” or “the clear”. They were sky-high on blow, and that’s how we liked it, damn it!
Anyway, as New York City is being blanketed by some awful ice snow dealie, I’ve decided, what better way to waste a day off than to break out a good old steroid-fueled live blog? Wait, that came out wrong. We’re off to a good start – we’ve already got rumors that Roger Clemens is going to be busted in this thing. The guy who was more effective at 45 than most players are at 25 was juicing? NO!
Also, I’m just as interested to see how all of the talking heads in the sports media respond to this – because you can be sure that they’re all on RED ALERT today – because often, that’s more entertaining than the story itself.
For example, I’m sure that ESPN will take a calm, measured response, with no sensationalistic qualities.

Oh boy. We’re off to a great start here. More to come, starting 1pm EST.
Report: Hiroki Kuroda To Sign With The Dodgers
December 12, 2007 at 3:48 am | Posted in Hiroki Kuroda | 3 CommentsAccording to published reports from Rotoworld, and the Seattle PI.com’s blog, pitcher Hiroki Kuroda has chosen the Dodgers over the Mariners and is expected to arrive at LAX from Tokyo at 9:30 A.M., PST to take a physical and sign a contract that’s reportedly in the neighborhood of 3 years/$30 million.
So, let’s start out with the good: if the reported contract is accurate, then, really, that’s not a bad contract. Sure, while giving around $30 million to a 32 year old Japanese pitcher who has never pitched in MLB might seem a tad… risky, this is the type of money you have to cough up for back of the rotation starters in this market… hell, it’s practically the going rate for closers (see Francisco Cordero)! Also, in a very thin pitching class this offseason that include the likes of Carlos Silva and Kyle Loshe, Kuroda is the cream of the crop. Yeah, a lot of the pitchers on the market are “proven,” but they’ve proven that they will be mediocre at best for a lot of money, while Kuroda at least has the potential upside.
Here’s the scouting report from Prospect Insider’s Jason A. Churchill…
Stuff -
Fastball:
Kuroda sits 90-92 with a four-seam fastball that shows good leverage, although only a fair amount of sink. He will touch 93-94 at times and with good arm side tail that is very effective against right-handed batters.He has solid command of the fastball and is not afraid to elevate the pitch to change planes to give the hitter something else to look at, which is ideal since the 33-year-old does not throw a curve ball.
He surrendered 20 homers in his 179 2/3 innings, which is a solid number considering the size of the ballparks, but would benefit greatly from Safeco Field’s spacious alleys.
Slider:
Kuroda uses a true slider in the way that fellow Japanese hurler Daisuke Matsuzaka does, with good depth and varying velocities. Kuroda will typically rush his slider to the plate in the 84-86 mph range, but will need to keep the pitch down more consistently in the states.At times he’ll fall in love with his slider a little bit, which is consistent with other Japanese pitchers.
Splitter:
Kuroda’s fork-split is his best pitch and the one in which he will record the majority of his strikeouts. He’s capable of throwing it for strikes, but it’s much more effective as a change-of-pace offering that falls off the table into the dirt.He will induce some swings and misses with it as it travels to the plate in the 82-86 mph range.
The Scoop:
Kuroda is the class of the three free agents and will get the most interest but he profiles as a No. 3 at best, depending mostly on how well he adapts to the patient approach of the hitters in MLB.He’s slow to the plate but has a relatively compact and clean delivery that gives his fastball some late life. Needs to improve holding runners (this will be something all four scouting reports will read, as it’s generally not a strong area for Japanese pitchers).
Considering the domestic market, Kuroda, even at 33 years old, could command a contract in the $9-11 million range, for at least three years.
“He could blow, like most of the starters that have come from Japan,” said a scout that saw the three free agents this past summer. “But he is the one the group of starters that stands out.”
Seattle’s interest level is believed to be very high.
So, there you go; good stuff, but nothing really exceptional. In Japan, Kuroda put up a very solid career, with a career 3.69 ERA, pitching in a stadium that is an extreme hitters park. In fact, see for yourself…
He is known as an innings eater and has earned the nickname “Mr. Complete Game.” In his career, he has thrown 74 complete games and threw 7 last year, 11 in 2006, and a career high 13 in 2001… yeah, that’s pretty good. He had a career year in 2006, going 13-6 with a 1.85 ERA and 1.00 WHIP, but that seems to be more an aberration than a trend. However, what Kuroda has been able to sustain throughout his career is a decent K/9 rate (6.68 through 2006… some sites don’t have the 2007 stats listed), and he has really good control, putting up 1.4 BB/9, 4.9 K/BB from 2005-2006 (again, data issue there).
However, despite some of the Madduxian control he’s displayed recently, Jeff at Lookoutlanding.com, a Mariners blog, did an interesting study on how Japanese pitchers’ walk rates tend to rise as they make the transition:
Kuroda’s no spring chicken, but he’s had some strong seasons in Japan, most notably the 2006 campaign that saw him post a 1.85 ERA with a K/uBB ratio over 8. That level of success was out of character with the rest of his career, though, and he regressed to a 3.56 ERA and 3.2 K/uBB in 2007. (He did have some elbow discomfort, but it was nothing.) Still, looking over the entire track record, he’s been a good pitcher, and he’s excelled first and foremost because he just doesn’t issue many walks. Hiroki Kuroda throws strikes.
But there’s a funny thing about that. Daisuke Matsuzaka and Kei Igawa threw strikes in Japan too, and they saw their walk rates fly north after making the switch. Of the six big starting pitchers who made the transition from Japan to the US (Matsuzaka, Nomo, Yoshii, Ishii, Igawa, Irabu), five of them wound up walking more batters, with Nomo standing as the lone exception, presumably because his delivery was so fucking weird. It would appear that Kuroda’s due for a bit of a hike in free passes.
So, overall, it is hard to project exactly how Kuroda will translate. He might have Saito like success or he might wind up being Ishii reincarnated, who couldn’t hit an elephant in the ass with a fucking cannonball. But will Kuroda be an ace and turn into our savior next season? Uh… no, rather like someone who will be a #4, with the potential to be a #3 on a good day. However, based on the money, market and possible upside, it’s a worthy gamble for the Dodgers.
And, of course, the obvious beauty of this signing – which is my favorite reason – is that it further decreases the chances of Matt Kemp (and possibly Andre Ethier) getting traded. It also puts Ned in a nice position for trades; with Kuroda, the Dodgers have filled a hole and now don’t really have to acquiesce to the Baltimore’s, Minnesota’s or Oakland’s of the world for pitching at the expense of half the farm.
So we sign probably the cream of the FA pitching crop to bolster our rotation and we don’t have to give up any kids for it. Sweet.
What? You’re still not convinced? O.K., remember this:
He’s not Brett Tomko.
- Vin 
So, Who Is This Kershaw Kid Anyway?
December 9, 2007 at 8:53 pm | Posted in Clayton Kershaw | 4 CommentsSee that kid? The one over there, to the right, with me imploring Ned Colletti not to trade him? The one with a name that suggests he ought to be playing banjos in the Yonder Mountain String Band? (that’s a thing, right?) Or possibly suggests that he ought to be whittling and helping Brandine raise Tiffany, Heather, Cody, Dylan, Dermot, Jordan, Taylor, Brittany, Wesley, Rumer, Scout, Cassidy, Zoe, Chloe, Max, Hunter, Kendall, Caitlin, Noah, Sasha, Morgan, Kyra, Ian, Lauren, Q-Bert, and Phil? (that’s a reference, right?)
Well I’m betting most casual Dodger fans have no idea just who that is. In fact, I’d say that the most casual of those fans actively dislike him, because all they know of that 19-year old kid is that whoever he is, he’s an enormous part of why Miguel Cabrera, Johan Santana, and Erik Bedard won’t end up in Dodger Blue.
“Who? That kid’s a teenager! Trade him for someone I recognize NOW! I demand immediate satisfaction!”
And that, frie
nds, is why baseball history is littered with the corpses of Scott Kazmir-for-Victor Zambrano and Jeff Bagwell-for-Larry Andersen.
But fret not! This is exactly why Mike Scioscia’s tragic illness is here – to try and shed a little light on why this 19-year old appears to be more than worth the wait.
So who is this kid? Well, MiLB.com just named him their #4 overall prospect in the minors, and the #1 pitcher. So, uh, yeah – he’s got that going for him. Says the article,
Clayton Kershaw is so good that he’d likely still be the highest-ranked pitcher on this list even if he were right-handed. His combination of size, mound presence and stuff was the best the Minors had to offer.
Well, that’s a pretty good start. Okay, but what about Baseball Prospectus (before the 2007 season)?
The ideal high school lefthander: Tall, long-armed, with clean mechanics. His fastball already sits at 92-94 mph, touches 96, and there is room for more. The curveball is also a true plus offering, and his change has progressed by leaps and bounds since being all but non-existent during his prep career. Beyond the stuff, his command and understanding of his craft is well beyond his years.
Alright, okay, I like where we’re going here. Let’s spin the wheel and get some stats!
As an 18-year-old in rookie ball, in 2006:
10 games. 1.95 ERA. 0.89 WHIP. And a simply astonishing 54-5 K-BB ratio, in 37 innings, for a 13.14 K/9 ratio. Whoa.
But fine, rookie ball, big deal. How about against some higher competition?
As a 19-year-old in A-ball, in 2007:
20 games. 2.77 ERA. 1.25 WHIP. And 134 more strikeouts in just 97.1 innings.
But then when he got bumped up to AA Jacksonville on August 6, things would have to go downhill. 19-year-olds can’t handle that kind of competition. Right?
As a 19-year-old in AA-ball, in 2007:
5 games. 3.65 ERA. 1.38 WHIP. Okay, so he didn’t dominate there, but he more than held his own, plus – still more than a K per inning, 29 in 24.2 IP. Oddly enough, of his five starts, two were against the Montgomery Biscuits, and they were both bad, combining for 7 runs in 7.1 innings. But in his other starts, he threw 6 scoreless innings (8 K), 7 two-hit innings with 10 K, and 4.1 three-hit innings in his debut. That’s two real solid gems there – for a teenager in a talented league.
But stats and reviews are all well and good, right? Dammit, I want hardware!
Picked for 2007 Futures Game
2007 Midwest League Prospect of the Year
2007 Southern League Pitcher of the Week (Aug 27)
2007 Midwest League Mid-Season All-Star
2007 Midwest League Pitcher of the Week (June 4)
2006 Gulf Coast League Player of the Year
And we wonder why everyone, and I mean everyone, is asking for this guy? So maybe, just maybe, could the newspaper reporters knock it off when they dump on the Dodgers for not being willing to trade this kid? We all know there’s “no such thing as a pitching prospect”… but this is as close as you’re ever going to the real deal.
Breaking News: Latest Offer For Santana
December 7, 2007 at 7:28 am | Posted in rumors | 4 CommentsThis just in, the Dodgers have just made another offer to the Twins for Johan Santana. This is being confirmed by a source no less credible than Bill Plashke or Ken Rosenthal, The Onion:
NASHVILLE, TN—Dodgers GM Ned Colletti announced Monday that although he has nothing to offer in the way of financial or material wealth, he is prepared to give the Twins the most beautiful thing of all—the moon itself—in exchange for pitcher Johan Santana. “I come to you today with no worldly possessions—save only my dreams. But to obtain the one you call Johan, I would happily toss a lasso ’round the moon and pull it down for you, or set a ladder amongst the stars and pluck them one by one from the night sky,” Colletti shouted up to Twins GM Bill Smith, who stood on the balcony of the Opryland Hotel. “And should you not be satisfied with our package of the moon at night, the stars so bright, the sun that lights your days, and all that sparkles and shines in Heaven and on Earth, we may be willing to part with first baseman James Loney.” After the Twins rejected his offer, Colletti promised the A’s his hand in marriage in exchange for Danny Haren.
Colletti’s virtue for Danny Haren? Now that’s a trade I’d make in a heartbeat.
Dodgers Sign Andruw Jones
December 5, 2007 at 11:01 pm | Posted in Andruw Jones | 6 Comments According to the L.A. Times, the Dodgers have signed Andruw Jones to a 2 year/$36 million deal. We’ll have a lot more in
depth analysis later on, with all the fun statistical jargon, but a few quick points:
The good? First off, the contract. In fact, the contract is REALLY good. If there’s one thing Ned Colletti should be commended on, it’s his shrewdness of handing out more money, but for less years (i.e. Furcal). Perhaps he swayed Andruw into coming to L.A. by taking a page from Tony Reagans and finalizing the deal at the local Taco Bell over chalupas (¡Yo quiero Andruw Jones!)? While Andruw is not quite what he used to be defensively, this move improves the Dodgers’ defense in center field dramatically. In fact, if Andruw Jones were a blind, no armed, no legged amputee, he would still be an improvement over Juan Pierre. While there is certainly a concern over his numbers at the plate this past season, there were many reports that his 2007 season was filled with injuries, in particular a hyper-extended elbow, which hindered his offensive production. If he can begin 2008 healthy and produce even remotely like the old Andruw, then the Dodgers have finally landed the power bat that they’ve been looking for. And if not? They’re only on the hook for two years, which sure beats the hell out of giving 5 years to an injury prone and flukey Aaron Rowand or a slightly above average Torii Hunter.
Having said that, a lot of my feelings on this signing are also contingent with what happens with Pierre. If the Dodgers can trade Pierre for a bag of balls, then this deal is excellent and I LOVE IT! But if this means Pierre is moved to left and clears the way for Matt Kemp and/or Andre Ethier to be traded, then not so much. What does comfort me is the fact that it would not make sense to trade Kemp to Baltimore for, say, Erik Bedard only to risk the possibility of losing both Bedard and Jones in two years. As of right now, though, the Dodgers’ future is sure looking good, but expect the other shoe to drop very soon…
Welcome to L.A., Andruw.
Edit: Per ESPN on the contract details…
Jones will receive a $12.2 million signing bonus, of which $5.1 million is payable next year, $2.1 million in 2009 and $5 million in 2010. He well get salaries of $9 million next year and $15 million in 2009, and also will receive a no-trade clause.
- Vin 
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

“Gary provides us with a veteran catcher who can spell Russell from time to time,” said Colletti. “ He has been a member of some very good teams and the fact that he has spent his entire Major League career in the National League is also something we found to be beneficial.”Bennett, 35, spent the last two seasons as the primary backup catcher to Yadier Molina in St. Louis and hit .252 with two homers and 17 RBI in 2007. Over his 12-year career, Bennett has 21 home runs, 188 RBI, 73 doubles and a .242 career average. The Illinois native was drafted in 1990 by Philadelphia and has spent his entire career in the National League, playing for the Phillies, Mets, Rockies, Padres, Brewers, Nationals and Cardinals.






