Well, THAT Happened

midp13807130259_31.jpgSo as you’ve probably heard by now, the Fish traded Miguel Cabrera, Dontrelle Willis, and Fredi Gonzalez’ will to live to Detroit for top prospects Andrew Miller, Cameron Maybin, and four other players. I’m not here to dissect who won this deal *coughDetroitcough*, but rather because I’m kind of concerned about the implications this has for the Dodgers.

Let’s just say that Miller and Maybin are equal in trade value to Clayton Kershaw and Matt Kemp. It’s not a perfect comparision – I think the Dodgers pair is slightly more valued – but for the sake of this discussion, it’s close enough. The other four players are an MLB-ready backup catcher, and 3 minor league pitchers, who Keith Law describes as a “bullpen flamethrower”, “possible NL 5th starter”, and an “organizational arm”.

Here’s my issue with this. As detailed here, and here, on this site, amongst many other places, the Fish were asking an astronomical amount for Cabrera alone. For just him, the Marlins were rumored to be asking for “four players from a group that includes pitcher Chad Billingsley, pitching prospect Clayton Kershaw, third baseman Andy LaRoche, first baseman James Loney and outfielder Matt Kemp.”

Yet somehow, the Tigers got both Cabrera and Willis for a package that’s equal to two of the players from that group, plus four much less valuable players. Now, I heard that what the Marlins were asking for from the Dodgers was astronomical from many different sources, so I’m inclined to believe it. So why did they ask the Dodgers for seemingly more for just Cabrera than they ended up taking from Detroit for Cabrera and Willis?

This is actually something I’ve been concerned about for years: that the Dodgers’ superior farm system actually works against them in trades. Too many teams are more worried about how the trade “looks” than in the actual quality of the players they get back. That is, if they get two of the three best players from a team with a weaker farm system, those two players may only be equivalent to the 6th and 7th best Dodger prospects. So then this conversation happens:

GM: “Team X is going to give us their #2 and #3 prospects. Give us your top two if you want to beat them.”

Ned: “But that’s not equal. Our #2 and #3 are wayyyy better than those guys. That’s equal to our B+ guys.”

GM: “But it’s their 2nd and 3rd best. Why would I take your 6th and 7th best? What do you think I am, stupid?”

Ned: “Well, now that you mention it….”

*click*

And that’s how Detroit ends up with both Miggy and Dontrelle for a package far less than what we would have had to pay. And that’s why we don’t make any blockbuster deals.

- Mike Scioscia’s tragic illness msti-face.jpg

Winter Meetings: Day 2

Short on time today, but I really wanted to address today’s newest hot rumor: WFAN in New York City, probably going off this ESPN blog, is reporting that the Dodgers are hot on the trail of Orioles LHP Erik Bedard, with Matt Kemp and Jonathan Broxton rumored to be amongst the players headed East.

First, lets address: do we want Bedard? Well. Yes. Sure, there’s the 5th-place finish in the AL Cy Young race this year, and the best K/9ip ratio in the entire league at 10.93, despite having to face the Sox and Yankees and Rays (who have a pretty solid lineup) more than anyone else.

But when I evaluate a player, what I really like to see are trends. This is how we could be pretty sure that Luis Gonzalez was going to be a bust, because his OPS has been going down steadily for about 6 years now. Trends are a good sign that a player is still improving, or has peaked and is declining.

So what are Bedard’s trends, in his 4 full seasons of starting (04-07)?

Damn good.

bedard.jpg

ERA+: 100, 108, 121, 146
WHIP: 1.602, 1.384, 1.350, 1.088

He’ll be 29 on Opening Day. He did get hurt last season and missed the last month – though at least it was with a strained oblique, not arm issues. Adding him to our current rotation? A front 4 of Bedard/Penny/Lowe/Billingsley is mighty mighty tasty. And then if Schmidt can come anywhere close to what he had been as the #5 starter.. well, that ain’t not half bad.

As for paying the price? I’m torn. On one hand, if it’s Broxton/Kemp/lesser pieces, it sure is refreshing to see that a deal can be made without having to give up Kershaw, Loney, or LaRoche.

On the other hand, if Kemp’s out the door, something has to be done about the offense. Perhaps signing Rowand, or Jones.

I’m really torn. I know this post is less about stats, and more stream-of-conciousness, but that’s what happens when I try to sneak these in at work.

Final analysis: if this happens, I won’t be horribly upset about it. And I will love watching this pitching staff. But a big part of me wonders if we shouldn’t just sign Kuroda, and keep Kemp and/or go after another bat.

Then again. Erik Bedard in Blue. Tasty, tasty thoughts.

What’s your thoughts?

Mike Scioscia’s tragic illness msti-face.jpg