Dodgers Sign Andruw Jones
December 5, 2007 at 11:01 pm | In Andruw Jones | According to the L.A. Times, the Dodgers have signed Andruw Jones to a 2 year/$36 million deal. We’ll have a lot more in
depth analysis later on, with all the fun statistical jargon, but a few quick points:
The good? First off, the contract. In fact, the contract is REALLY good. If there’s one thing Ned Colletti should be commended on, it’s his shrewdness of handing out more money, but for less years (i.e. Furcal). Perhaps he swayed Andruw into coming to L.A. by taking a page from Tony Reagans and finalizing the deal at the local Taco Bell over chalupas (¡Yo quiero Andruw Jones!)? While Andruw is not quite what he used to be defensively, this move improves the Dodgers’ defense in center field dramatically. In fact, if Andruw Jones were a blind, no armed, no legged amputee, he would still be an improvement over Juan Pierre. While there is certainly a concern over his numbers at the plate this past season, there were many reports that his 2007 season was filled with injuries, in particular a hyper-extended elbow, which hindered his offensive production. If he can begin 2008 healthy and produce even remotely like the old Andruw, then the Dodgers have finally landed the power bat that they’ve been looking for. And if not? They’re only on the hook for two years, which sure beats the hell out of giving 5 years to an injury prone and flukey Aaron Rowand or a slightly above average Torii Hunter.
Having said that, a lot of my feelings on this signing are also contingent with what happens with Pierre. If the Dodgers can trade Pierre for a bag of balls, then this deal is excellent and I LOVE IT! But if this means Pierre is moved to left and clears the way for Matt Kemp and/or Andre Ethier to be traded, then not so much. What does comfort me is the fact that it would not make sense to trade Kemp to Baltimore for, say, Erik Bedard only to risk the possibility of losing both Bedard and Jones in two years. As of right now, though, the Dodgers’ future is sure looking good, but expect the other shoe to drop very soon…
Welcome to L.A., Andruw.
Edit: Per ESPN on the contract details…
Jones will receive a $12.2 million signing bonus, of which $5.1 million is payable next year, $2.1 million in 2009 and $5 million in 2010. He well get salaries of $9 million next year and $15 million in 2009, and also will receive a no-trade clause.
- Vin 
6 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.


Agreed Vinny. Very good news indeed.
Comment by James — December 6, 2007 #
“In fact, if Andruw Jones were a blind, no armed, no legged amputee, he would still be an improvement over Juan Pierre.”
Ranks right up there with line of the year.
Comment by Mike — December 6, 2007 #
Apologies for using the exact same “shoe to drop” idiom in my post. I hadn’t read yours yet in the rush to print (damn printers’ deadlines). Our bad!
Comment by SoSG Steve Sax — December 6, 2007 #
From the fan perspective this is a great signing since we upgraded the OF in a big way without parting with any prospects, plus we didn’t give anyone some bloated 4-5 year deal, so if it’s a mistake it’s an expensive (but short) one.
Comment by Satchel — December 6, 2007 #
One other comment, I don’t think Pierre needs to be traded at all. Sure he’s going to be the league’s most expensive backup but that’s a sunk cost and even if he does get traded, the Dodgers would surely still have to pay some of his salary. He can come in to pinch run, ($9m pinch runner!), he can start some games and bat 8th, he can rotate around when there are injuries, etc. Since he brings pretty much nothing in a trade, may as well keep him, he’s a hustler and he works harder then anyone, etc.
Comment by Satchel — December 6, 2007 #
[...] Pierre sucks, baseball prospectus | We’re not always right around here, you know. Sometimes we’re strongly for a move that backfires horribly. And sometimes we question a move that works out wonderfully. And sometimes [...]
Pingback by Can We Just Get Hu Back Up Here Already? « Mike Scioscia’s tragic illness — August 7, 2008 #