Pierre to DL, Repko Returns
June 30, 2008 at 1:51 pm | In Jason Repko, Juan Pierre sucks | 4 CommentsWhich can, of course, only be followed by more injured Dodgers once Repko runs them down. Just in from Dodger HQ:
LOS ANGELES – The Los Angeles Dodgers today placed outfielder Juan Pierre on the 15-day disabled list with sprained medial collateral ligament (MCL) in his left knee and recalled outfielder Jason Repko from Triple-A Las Vegas. General Manager Ned Colletti made the announcement.
Repko, who will wear No. 17, is available for tonight’s series opener at Houston.
This ought to get interesting.
I Am Never Taking A Vacation Again
June 30, 2008 at 12:05 am | In Andre Ethier, Joe Torre, Juan Pierre sucks, Matt Kemp | 3 CommentsSo I’m gone for all of four days. Unlike most other trips I’ve been on in the past, I’m completely cut off this time - no TV, no internet (save for what I can glean from my phone), no newspapers. But hey, what could happen, right? The Dodgers are going to play the Angels, and they’ll lose - because they always do when they play Anaheim - and I’ll come back not having missed much, while leaving the site in the capable hands of my cohort, Vin.
Boy, was I ever mistaken. Chan Ho Park continuing to find the fountain of youth, except somehow he’s not even 2000 Chan Ho Park, he’s 1965 Sandy Koufax? Getting no-hit - and winning? Mark Sweeney trying to place the blame for his crapulence on the team? And, of course, the incredible twists in the Juan Pierre saga over the last 24 hours?
Let’s work backwards on this one. Yesterday, Pierre hurt his left knee stealing second base, when Angels SS Erick Aybar fell onto him. This in itself is news if only because of Pierre’s incredible durability; he’s never been on the DL in his career despite nearly always playing every single day. He’s got an MRI scheduled for tomorrow, but there’s no word on how much - if any, other than tomorrow - time he might miss. Now, I want to be very clear on this: I’m not happy that Pierre got injured. As much as we whip on him around here, I’ve never rooted for any player, especially a Dodger, to get hurt. That’s just not right.
But that being said… who’s not a little happy that Joe Torre might have to start filling out lineups without his binky in them? Who’s not excited at the possibility of seeing Young/Kemp/Ethier on a regular basis, with perhaps Jason Repko or Xavier Paul called up in reserve? Because, sorry to say… Joe Torre cannot be trusted with Juan Pierre: (clearly written before JP hurt his knee)
When the center fielder returns after the All-Star break, Torre said Jones will take back his starting spot in center and Juan Pierre will stay in left field, leaving Matt Kemp and Andre Ethier for right field.
Torre said the right-field situation will not be a straight platoon between the righty Kemp and lefty Ethier.
“More likely, it would be who’s playing well or who has a hot bat or who seems to have more life in their body, or something like that,” Torre said. “It’s going to be more a feel thing than just a platoon thing.”
Ah, geez. Here we go again. “Who seems to have more life in their body”? Really? This is what we’re basing lineup decisions on now? Do you realize that of the Dodgers who have enough at-bats to qualify for the batting title, Kemp and Ethier rank 3rd and 4th on the team in OPS? Juan Pierre, meanwhile, has a .653 OPS. How many ways are there to explain how lousy a .653 OPS is? Let’s count!
1. 120 points lower than both Kemp and Ethier
2. 45 points behind Jeff Kent, who as you may remember, is currently battling to be the worst cleanup hitter of the last half-century
3. Just 9 points higher than Gary Bennett, who nearly every fan despised when he was playing
4. 169th in all of MLB, behind such luminaries as Jack Hannahan (hitting .224 with 3 HR) and Felipe Lopez (hitting .243 with 2 HR)
5. Worse than two LA pitchers, Kuo and ex-Dodger Loaiza (small sample size be damned. Two pitchers!)
6. Most importantly, the worst number Pierre has ever put up in his entire career.
Not to mention how superior Kemp and Ethier each are defensively. Now look, I can understand giving Andruw Jones back his center field job, despite how bad he was earlier in the season. As you surely don’t need me to tell you, this team is desperate for a power bat, and while Jones was most definitely not that bat before his knee surgery, it’s certainly worth the risk to see if his problems really were health-related. I mean, can you imagine how different this lineup would look if Jones could get anywhere near back to his 2005-06 self? But someone, please, explain to me how Juan Pierre in his worst season, is worth pushing guys who are already better (and should still have room to improve) to the bench is good for this team.
Although the Dodgers have struggled to a 20-28 mark entering Sunday without Furcal after starting 18-14 with him, Torre said that has not been Pierre’s fault.
“He’s certainly been a player through this whole thing who’s been a consistent guy, every day refuses to acknowledge bumps and bruises that he’s nursing,” Torre said. “He’s been great, he really has. I can’t think of any way to explain it.”
Torre’s right here, in a wrong sort of way. As we’ve discussed before, the struggles of the Dodger offense can’t be blamed only on Pierre. It’s hard to blame any one player on a team that’s put up three hits over the last two games. Clearly, everyone’s to blame. But when he says that Pierre has been “a consistent guy”, it shouldn’t be taken in the way that Torre means it. Has Pierre been consistent? Sure! Consistently mediocre. I mean, Jeffrey Dahmer “consistently” ate people. Certainly it’s a little unfair of me to compare a baseball player I don’t particularly like to a serial killer, but the point is that the word Joe Torre is using as a compliment isn’t exactly that. As for “he’s been great, he really has”… I’m just going to sadly sigh and move on.
Although Pierre did not even start on Opening Day and started just 16 of 32 games before Furcal’s injury forced him into the leadoff spot, Torre said his play has earned him that starting job.
Pierre’s 22 multihit games entering Sunday are tied with James Loney for the team lead, and he has stolen 13 bases in his past 19 games, getting caught just once. He’s even knocked in a few runs, driving in runs in five of six games from June 14-20.
“About half the month of April and right through the month of June he’s been really great, and I can’t ignore what a difference he’s made,” Torre said.
Joe. Come on, Joe. I don’t like reiterating this kind of thing any more than I’m sure everyone likes to keep having to read it, but if he’s going to keep making comments like this, how am I supposed to ignore it? “His play has earned him the starting job”? How?! By every single measure, Pierre is having the lousiest season of his career. And considering he was hardly Mickey Mantle before this year, that’s saying a lot. Having a lot of multihit games isn’t really all that impressive when you play every single day and bat leadoff every single day. As I said the last time I had to try to convince people about Pierre, counting stats just aren’t that great when you get more opportunities than everyone else to accumulate them. No one’s questioned his prowess on the basepaths, so the steals are great, but let’s not pretend a guy with 24 RBI is some sort of run producer now.
Of course, this might all be moot, depending on the severity of Pierre’s injury. But it just goes to show that for all the fanfare surrounding Joe Torre’s arrival this season, he’s showing more and more signs that he just doesn’t ‘get it’. Like I’ve been saying since the day Pierre signed, my problem has never really been with him. Give or take, you pretty much know exactly what you’re going to get from Juan Pierre - a decent batting average, zero power, lousy on-base skills, great speed with lots of steals, and a poor outfield arm. That’s the player he is, and that’s fine. The problem is with management types like Ned Colletti and Joe Torre deciding, respectively, that a player like that is worth $44 million and playing ahead of clearly more talented teammates.
Let’s give Rotoworld the last word:
Juan Pierre left Sunday’s game because of a left leg injury sustained sliding into second base.
With Andruw Jones set to return this week, the Dodgers would benefit if Pierre landed on the disabled list. As is, he’s set to remain the regular left fielder, leaving superior players Matt Kemp and Andre Ethier to battle for at-bats.
Glad it’s not just us Dodger die-hards who see this.
Random Stupid Quotes And Stupid People: Mark Sweeney
June 29, 2008 at 6:54 pm | In Mark Sweeney, Please God Let Sweeney Be Gone!, Random Boneheadedry | 6 CommentsFrom this morning’s L.A. Daily News, Mark Sweeney explains the reasons of his struggles this year:
I never make excuses, but
Yet here comes the excuse…
The situations I have been in haven’t been ideal for pinch-hitting and putting your piece into a team, because offensively we have struggled. There are times when you feel like you’re in the flow of the game and you want to put your piece in, whether it’s advancing a runner or putting a ball in play.
O.K., I am now convinced that Sweeney is on crack. What the hell does this mean? For starters, what is an ideal pinch hitting situation and non-ideal pinch hitting situation? I’m guessing that he means one where he’s able to come up with runners on, as opposed to the bases empty and, because he feels he’s getting more of the latter, that’s why he has struggled.
So, basically, the reason he is now hitting .098 is because of the fact that his team cannot give him “ideal situations” to come in and do his job.
O.K., let’s look a little more in depth into this.
In his 61 at-bats this season, only 29 of them (less than half) have been with the bases empty. In these 29 at-bats, he is 2 for 29 (which is a third of the amount of hits he has all season, by the way), which amounts of to .069/.100/.103 line.
O.K., fine, so, you’re right, Sweeney Poo (poo?). Discounting the fact that some of these at-bats also count the starts that you’ve had this year, we get it; you’re not great with the bases empty. You’re a lean, mean, pinch hitting machine when it matters… that’s right, with runners in scoring position!
Sweeney with RISP: 1 for 17, .059/.227/.059
Err… O.K. They can’t be in scoring position. Just on base.
Sweeney with runners on first and second: 0 for 3: .000/.000/.000
O.K., so you mean second and third?
Sweeney with runners on second and third: 0 for 3: .000/.000/.000
Bases loaded?
Sweeney with bases loaded: 0 for 1: .000/.500/.000
No…? How about leading off an inning?
Sweeney leading off an inning: 0 for 8: .000/.000/.000
Close and late?
Sweeney close and late: 2 for 19: .105/.250/.158
How about scoring position with two outs?
Sweeney with RISP with 2 outs: 0 for 10: .000/.167/.000
Oh, forget it, you just suck. And for that matter, quit your whining, Mark. Guess what? You decided to spend your career specializing in a role that is one of the hardest in the game. What the hell do you expect, to step into the game with bases loaded, 0 outs every night? To blame your failures on the rest of the team for not giving you “ideal situations” is ludicrous, especially when you have completely sucked in every which possible situation. I’m sure our starting rotation also doesn’t like our offense and it’s a freaking rarity when they get “ideal situations.” That hasn’t stopped most of them from doing their part. Your job is to hit the ball… regardless of who’s on base. A bases empty situation doesn’t exempt you from doing your job.
There’s your veteran leadership…
- Vin 
And That’s Dodger Baseball!
June 29, 2008 at 5:55 am | In Andre Ethier, Chad Billingsley, Luis Maza, Matt Kemp, Only The Dodgers..., We Got No-Hit And Won! | 2 CommentsTake that, Rory Markas! Seeing eye grounders might be Angels baseball, but winning while getting no-hit is Dodger Baseball, sucka!
O.K., now that I’ve finished doing cartwheels around the house (check!) and have laid off tormenting my trash talking, Angel loving cousin (check! and P.S.: incase you haven’t noticed, I REALLY love beating the Angels)… for now, let us examine this game a bit further. 
The biggest thing that everyone is going to notice and remember years down the road is the fact that the Dodgers got no-hit and still won the game. And, for the record, whether or not it’s official is irrelevant (it’s not, by the way, because the Dodgers only came up to bat for 8 innings, instead of the official 9). The Dodgers played an entire game without getting a hit; therefore, they were no-hit. Perhaps it won’t be recognized by MLB, but they still went an entire game without getting a hit. However, while all of this will be talked about, let’s not forget the man who is mostly responsible for transforming this game into a strange celebration, instead of it easily becoming a potential horrific, and monumental embarrassment.
That is, of course, none other than Thunder Thighs, a.k.a. Chad Billingsley.
Thunder Thighs, in 111 pitches, threw 7 brilliant scoreless innings, while giving up 3 hits, walking 3, and striking out 7. That’s pretty good and it was probably his best start of the year. Total domination.
I think that with kids like Martin, Loney, Kemp usually being the focus of attention, and with the hype surrounding Clayton Kershaw, it seems as if Billingsley is slightly forgotten. That’s not to say that people won’t recognize his talent, but I think we can sometimes forget just how good he’s been or at least how he continues to get better and better. The kid is only 23 and he’s no longer just putting up good numbers for a 23 year old, he’s putting up great numbers, period. He got off to a bit of an erratic start, which began by Joe Torre dictating his first start by Yahoo! Weather or something, but, even despite that, look at his numbers:
ERA: 3.29 (1st on Dodgers, T-13th in NL)
K: 102 (1st on Dodgers, 5th in NL)
K/9: 9.56 (1st on Dodgers, 2nd in NL)
WPA: 1.22 (1st on Dodgers, 12th in NL)
pLI: 1.05 (5th on Dodgers, 9th in NL)
This isn’t to make Thunder Thighs out to be perfect. He still has some areas to improve on. He still needs to be more efficient with his pitch count, needs to harness his control a bit better, but a lot of this is expected from a young kid. He is just doing really well and he continues to get better and that’s while already currently being our ace. He’s my favorite starter to watch pitch and he’s only going to get better.
Another person who deserves some credit is Matt Kemp. My God, I have never seen a ground ball with that much english in my life. The ball just completely turned the opposite direction to throw off Weaver. He was able to steal second and get home. Way to manufacture a run and not get thrown into a rundown in the process.
Also, credit to Andre Ethier, who gunned down Erick Aybar on a double in the 6th inning. Considering a walk and a horrific fielding error by Jeff Kent followed that, you also saved our ass.
I suppose that’s not bad for a few of the kids who don’t really “get it” and don’t give constant fellatio to old, crusty veterans.
Finally, for as much flack as our offense gets, and rightfully so, while our offense might be sucking, our pitching sure hasn’t. In the past week:
6-28-08: W: 1-0
6-27-08: W: 6-0
6-26-08: L: 2-0
6-25-08: W: 5-0
Dodgers’ pitching overall this season ranks 2nd in the NL in ERA (3.77) while ranking in the top 5 in K’s, WHIP, and in the fewest amount of walks. Not bad, considering the fact that our “ace” is on the DL and, before that, he and our #2 had sucked for the first two months.
So, let’s see: a team with great pitching, but horrific hitting. Can you say 2003?
Finally, here are words that I never thought I’d ever utter and probably won’t again: but props to Luis Maza. He made an absolutely insane play in the ninth inning to rob Casey Kotchman of what looked like a sure hit. While it didn’t seem all that important at first, and just merely the second out, that play saved the game. With the eventual double by Kendrick and walk to Napoli, if Maza doesn’t make that play, they at least tie it. So… right on, Luis!
Overall, this game pretty much sums up in a strange way why I love baseball. Yes, while we still need to remember that our struggling offense got no-hit, which is not good no matter how you slice it, the fact that we won reminds me that whether you’ve been watching for years and post constantly on your blog or even if you’ve been calling games for 60 years, you might run into something that you’ve never seen before, as the real Vin said, tonight. And leave it to the Dodgers to pull this off: the masters of the utterly insane, wacky and zany. I mean, really, think about the twisted irony of this whole situation: for a team that has had mostly a non-existent offense the entire year, an offense with no power that constantly loses games for its pitchers and gives them no support, they might have completely turned their season around and have gotten the sparkplug they needed…
By getting no-hit.
Absolutely crazy.
Savor it, folks. Chances are, you’ll never see it again.
- Vin 
Only The Dodgers…
June 28, 2008 at 9:51 pm | In Only The Dodgers..., We Got No-Hit And Won! | No CommentsReal Men Of Genius Presents: Chan Ho Park
June 28, 2008 at 7:01 pm | In Chan Ho Park, Real Men Of Genius | 1 CommentMSTI Presents: Real Men Of Genius.
Real men of geeee-ni-us!
Today we salute you, Mr. I Should Be Sucking And Continuing In A Steep Decline But I Have Made A Miraculous Comeback And Am Now Pitching Better Than I Have In Seven Years Man.
When conventional wisdom said that you were an old, washed up has-been who had completely raped the Texas Rangers 6 years ago of $65 million and couldn’t pitch anymore, YOU came back to defy the odds!
Sure, nobody thought that you had a chance in hell to make the roster when you signed a minor league contract with the Dodgers this spring. In fact, some of us, including myself, laughed at the prospect, thinking that you would be released before the season started.
However, we were wrong, Chan Ho. And we’re sorry.
We’re so, so sorry!
Last night, YOU came back to bitch slap the Angels for 6 shutout innings, only surrendering 4 hits, while striking out 7 and walking none. And what do you know? You didn’t even need to use your drop kick against them!
But wait… that is not the only good pitching performance you’ve had this season. Not only was that the second time you’ve pitched well against the Angels this year, but you’re also coming off a start against Cleveland where you went 5 innings, giving up 1 ER, and striking out 9. In fact, though it’s a small sample size, in your three starts this year, you have a 1.20 ERA and, throughout this season in general, your K/9 rate is higher this year (6.88 ) than it has been since 2002, while your WHIP (1.32) is the best it’s been since 2001. You’ve even done well in the bullpen. In the bullpen this year, you have put up a 3.03 ERA and, based on all Dodger pitchers who have thrown at least 50 innings, you have the second highest VORP at 17.9!
Take that Murray Chass!
The truth is, Channy, after being one of my favorite punch lines over the past 6 years, you’re making us feel good again. Nostalgic… like the old Chan Ho. You’re healthy, have regained your velocity, and stifling hitters. Does that mean that if you keep this up the rest of the year we should re-sign you to a new deal?
Oh, hell no!
But that doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t be a fixture in the rotation. In fact, you have been one of our best pitchers this year and with the numbers you have put up, you could arguably be one of our very top starters. That’s right, folks. I am advocating Chan Ho Park to be our starter. He is pitching the best he has in years and, in true Giovanni Cararra fashion, he is doing it with the Dodgers.
Just stay the hell away from Fernando Tatis!
The Ho is back and he’s pimping teams out! For that, MSTI salutes you!
- Vin 
Don’t Forget: Vote Martin 2008!
June 27, 2008 at 5:10 pm | In Russell Martin | No Comments
A little reminder to those who haven’t done so yet: All-Star voting ends at 11:59 P.M., EST, on July 2nd, 2008. That’s 5 days from now! The latest results have Martin out of the top 5. Are we going to stand for that?!
Vote now, and vote often!
- Vin 
Congratulations, Eric
June 26, 2008 at 12:06 am | In Brian Falkenborg, Eric Stults, Mike Koplove, Scott Proctor | 4 CommentsEric Stults: first shutout by a lefthanded Dodger since Kaz Ishii in 2004. There’s not a whole lot to add to this one, except to point out that it was pure domination. The Sox only managed four hits and a walk; not only that, Stults drove in a run of his own on a sacrifice fly.
In his two starts now, Stults is 2-0 with a 0.64 ERA, which is just one ER over 14 innings, and an excellent K/BB ratio of 4/1. Look, Stults isn’t a mega-prospect, and he’s not a kid. He’s 28 years old. His time, if he is to have one, is now. Let’s hope the Blue give him a shot to see what he can do. With Hiroki Kuroda not coming back for his Saturday start (Chan Ho Park will go) and Brad Penny possibly needing a rehab assignment, Stults will hopefully get at least a few more starts.
And, look: Eric Stults is no C.C. Sabathia. Clearly. But isn’t this just another log on the fire of “don’t trade for C.C. Sabathia!” Without even touching guys like James McDonald and Jon Meloan, the Dodgers have dipped into the minors to recall a guy who’s at least got the talent to shut down a good American League team. As we’ve said over and over… pitching is not the problem.
In other news, Scott Proctor’s going to the DL with “elbow tendinitis” - an injury he’s apparently been nursing for a month. As DodgerThoughts is completely correct in saying, we’ve had just about enough of guys trying to be tough and concealing injuries around here. Does it ever work out well? Ever? But that’s not my focus, for the moment. This is:
Basically, Joe admitted that the original plan with Proctor was to option him to Vegas, and apparently, Proctor was willing to go.
Am I the only one completely floored by this? Joe Torre’s infatuation with Scott Proctor is well known back to their days in New York. Despite how bad he’s been, I don’t think any of us actually thought the club would really do anything about it - especially not when they refuse to rectify the Mark Sweeney situation. I have to admit, I’m a little impressed and a lot surprised that they’d actually planned on sending him down to AAA. Maybe there’s hope after all?
On the other hand, they called up Brian Falkenborg, who already failed in one try with the Dodgers (7.53 ERA in 14.3 innings back in 2004) and has never really had any success in the bigs (5.74 ERA in parts of 5 seasons), while bypassing Mike Koplove, who’s got 222 MLB games of 120 ERA+ work under his belt. I’m sure that makes sense somehow… somewhere… in some reality.
Prizefight: Simers vs. Colletti
June 25, 2008 at 8:47 am | In Joe Torre, Ned Colletti, T.J. Simers | 13 CommentsYou know, sometimes I sit here and I say, “what should I write about today?” Usually, if I don’t already have a topic in mind, I hit upon something pretty quickly. And sometimes, I’m given a gift from the gods: Captain of all Clownshoes, TJ Simers, discussing the trading history of Ned Colletti.
Here’s the hard part, though. Simers is well-known for antagonizing, provoking, and mostly just being a pain-in-the-ass, and is probably my least favorite “reporter” in the world. On the other hand, he’s going to say that Ned Colletti hasn’t done a great job of trading, and that Dodger fans ought to be scared of what might happen leading up to the deadline - which is completely true. Ugh. How do I support either side here? This is going to be interesting. For the sake of brevity, I won’t dissect every word here, but just the fun pertinent parts.
You might want to hold your nose.
Angel Berroa. Mark Sweeney. Scott Proctor. Thomas Perez. Brady Clark. Marlon Anderson. Julio Lugo. Greg Maddux. Wilson Betemit. Elmer Dessens. B.J. LaMura. Mark Hendrickson. Toby Hall. Ben Kozlowski. Danys Baez. Jae Sao. Tim Hamulack. Lance Carter. And Andre Ethier for Milton Bradley – Bradley tied with Alex Rodriguez early Tuesday for the best batting average in the American League.
Right off the bat, a lot to get through, here. It’s amazing how one “paragraph” of proper names can bring up so many different emotions in a person. Emotions such as:
You’re right, TJ: Angel Berroa, Mark Sweeney, Julio Lugo, Mark Hendrickson, Danys Baez, Jae “Sao” (for the moment, we’ll ignore that a “professional reporter” couldn’t be bothered to spell “Seo” right. Wait, no we won’t. Do some research!), and Lance Carter. Colletti acquisitions that were either surprisingly bad (Seo), as mediocre as expected (Hendrickson), and pretty much hated from Day 1 (Berroa, Sweeney).
You’re wrong, TJ: Really? We’re going to kill Colletti over Greg Maddux? I’d give up a good-glove, no-hit, injury-prone backup shortstop (Cesar Izturis) for a guy who was excellent down the stretch for us in 2006 11 times out of 10. And Marlon Anderson - I assume you’ve forgotten that in exchange for a pitcher who currently has a 5.75 ERA in A-ball (Jhonny Nunez), the Dodgers got a guy who absolutely raked in September 2006 to the tune of .375/.431/.813 with 7 homers, including being part of the great 4+1 comeback. I’m no Colletti supporter, but credit where credit is due. Plus, while Proctor’s been terrible this year, he was excellent after being acquired last year.
No, really, shut up, TJ: I feel like I shouldn’t even have to discuss this, but saying “oh, Colletti shouldn’t have traded Milton Bradley” is the worst kind of second-guessing. Has anyone really forgotten why Bradley had to go? Did you not notice how acquiring Andre Ethier from a position of zero leverage was considered a steal? This is ridiculous. Hell, if not for the fact that Rangers GM Jon Daniels was in the right place at the right time just a week ago, the stories would be less “tied with A-Rod for AL batting lead” and more “Bradley incarcerated for murdering Royals broadcaster.”
No one cares about these guys, TJ: The fact that I know who B.J. LaMura and Ben Kozlowski are without looking them up just goes to point out that I really need to get out more, but I’m at a bit of a loss to explain why we care all that much about guys who were acquired for 40-year-old Sandy Alomar, Jr., and Cody Ross. And Brady Clark and Tim Hamulack? A fifth outfielder and a fringe bullpen arm. Big deal.
What the hell are you talking about, TJ: I see “Thomas Perez,” and I have no idea who Simers means. Typing “Thomas Perez” into baseball-reference gets me George Thomas Perez, who pitched in four games for the 1958 Pirates. So keeping in mind that Simers doesn’t care enough to make sure he spells names right, I can only assume he means Tomas Perez - but his only association with the Dodgers was 36 games in AAA last year, and and I can’t even find anything that says the Dodgers gave up anything to get him. Talk about a stretch.
Look at the list of what Colletti has acquired since being hired in late 2005, and that doesn’t include Esteban Loaiza plucked off waivers for $7 million, or the free-agent disasters.
“Hey, I was right there with Brian Cashman when we brought in Carl Pavano,” said Dodgers Manager Joe Torre in trying to defend Colletti, and isn’t that encouraging news, two guys now with no eye for talent putting their heads together to plot the Dodgers’ future.
Point: Simers. Colletti and Torre haven’t exactly been endearing themselves to us lately, what with decisions like batting Pierre leadoff every day and letting Mark Sweeney have a job. If Colletti feels he’s on the hot seat, who knows what sort of crazy moves might ensue.
You’re looking in hindsight, so your vision is perfect,” says Colletti, who apparently works with blinders on, the only logical explanation for some of these deals. “Who has come back to haunt us?”
A better question, I said, “is who did you acquire who really improved the team?”
“Ethier helped us,” he says. “Maddux helped us, Lugo gave us some support, Anderson certainly helped us in September of ‘06, and Hendrickson pitched. You do have to have players who pitch and play in the games.”
No question Hendrickson made it possible for the Dodgers to put nine men on the field on the days he got batted around.
And Colletti ties it up with a left hook! Lucky for him, this is a conversation about trades only and not free agents, or we could bring in Pierre, Schmidt, Jones, and Nomar to discuss who’s haunting us. But he is right on here: while the players who’ve come back from his trades may not have always worked out, he has at least shown a knack for trading away the right players. Sure, Edwin Jackson has shown glimpses of figuring things out in Tampa, but he still wouldn’t be one of the best 6-7 starters on this team right now. And like I said above, TJ: Maddux and Anderson were superb.
Most fans probably have you pegged as a GM who hasn’t done a very good job of bringing in talent,” I suggest, and he disagrees.
“I don’t know if that’s fact or fiction,” he says. “That’s your opinion.”
I offer to put it to the readers, but obviously so much hinges on the likes of Nomar Garciaparra, Jason Schmidt and Andruw Jones, and so a blindfold, please for Colletti.
Crack! Simers lands one to the jaw. Sorry, Ned. I can’t stand TJ, but you can’t possibly defend most of the free agent signings, and Juan Pierre and Brett Tomko haven’t even come up yet. While he’s done a good job of not trading away the good young talent that’s on the team right now… he didn’t acquire any of them either.
In other words, “as long as I don’t foul it up by making a trade,” Colletti says, and had Dan Evans and Kevin Malone been so quick, they might still be here.
And… the ref isn’t sure who to award this point to, because no one has any idea what Simers is talking about. Kevin Malone got fired because he fought other team’s fans in the stands and gave out expensive contracts to hurt pitchers (Kevin Brown, Darren Dreifort). Dan Evans got fired because he happened to be in charge when Frank McCourt bought the team and decided he wanted his own people. Where’s the comparison?
“The team needs to get healthy so we can figure out if we need any more help,” he says. “We definitely need to play better. We need a better feel and plan at bat. We’ve pitched pretty well and our bullpen has held up pretty well.
“But constituted as we are today and the approach we’re taking at the plate, it’d be a tough go the rest of the way.”
Unfortunately, yes. Last night’s game was a microcosm of the whole season, right? A very good starting pitching performance wasted due to the complete lack of offense.
Torre says he likes the approach Juan Pierre and Jeff Kent take, and Russell Martin does well at times, but the rest of the Dodgers’ lineup is too impatient and swings at too many bad pitches.
That’s a penalty on Torre, for a low blow into the groins of Dodger fans. Kent’s a Hall of Famer, so I suppose I can look past his lousy season and be okay with Torre praising his approach. But Pierre, really? We’re going to hold him up as one of the top two examples of plate approach? So what you’re saying is that you want everyone else to be 28% worse at the plate than the average NLer? You want other guys to be on a stretch where it’s been nearly three weeks since Pierre drew a walk? Forget Colletti, forget Simers. We might be hopeless. Oh, and I particularly like how Martin does well at times. His OPS is only a full 200 points better than Pierre’s, and he’s clearly one of the three best catchers in baseball. Yeah, shape up, kid!
Put it all together, and you have a GM who has yet to identify talent, a high-priced manager who has yet to make a connection with the talent brought in by previous GMs and the Diamondbacks just lost again.
So far, the Dodgers’ idea of a winning formula.
Pay attention, friends, because these are words I never thought I’d write: TJ Simers is dead-on right here. He may be a jerk and his schtick hasn’t been funny, well, ever, but if the Dodgers want to turn things around, it’s not going to be from looking for outside help - it’s going to require fixing the internal problems. And that starts right with the GM and manager.
Is James Loney Enormous, or Is He Holding a Golf Ball There?
June 24, 2008 at 12:21 am | In James Loney | 5 CommentsHey - fair’s fair. When players underperform, we point it out here. When management makes poor decisions (or, more accurately, several consistiently poor decisions), we take them to task. And there’s little more fun than bashing ridiculous reporters that have no idea what they’re talking about. So when someone’s showing up to play and going well, I can’t ignore it just because it’s not as much fun as blasting someone. Speaking of which, come on, Plashke! It’s been too long. We miss you!
Anyway, James Loney, for much of the year: pretty underwhelming. Labeled here as “the one true disappointment” and “average at best, and that’s being generous“ by Vin, and having an entire post dedicated to his mediocrity by me, he’d hardly been lighting the world on fire. As I said in an earlier post, he was never bad, per se, but he wasn’t all that great, either. At least nowhere near as good as we’d hoped he could be based on his partial seasons the last two years.
Well, guess what - when you’ve been as hot as he’s been over the last month, you deserve your own congratulatory blog post. On May 18th, when I wrote the post I linked to above, Loney’s line was .281/.330/.450, for a 101 OPS+. Not bad, certainly. But not great. Now, on June 23rd, just over a month
later? James is up to .310/.368/.469, thanks to an absolutely insane line over the last month of .380/.441/.533. Now that we can live with! Hey, there’s a ton of stats I could use to point out how good this guy has been lately. There’s the 1.313 OPS over the last two weeks, that’s pretty good. There’s the the fact that a .551 OBP over the last two weeks means he’s getting on base well over half the time, which is craziness. But here’s what stood out to me the most:
James Loney, last 14 days
BB: 7
K’s: 1
If that doesn’t show a hitter who is completely and utterly locked in, I don’t know what does. One strikeout in 49 plate appearances? Not to mention, that one strikeout coming against the reigning AL Cy Young Award winner (and hopefully, not future teammate) C.C. Sabathia?
Big James has now worked his way up to 11th in OPS amongst all MLB first basemen, which might not sound impressive until you remember that A), he started slowly, B) his power still hasn’t shown up (just 6 homers), and C) there’s some pretty monster competition at the position, offensively. Just in terms of OPS, he’s still outperforming names like Todd Helton, Miguel Cabrera, Mark Teixeira, and Ryan Howard. And considering those guys make something like $78 billion dollars while Loney still makes the minimum - and is just 24! - that’s pretty valuable.
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.




