The MSTI 17-Step 2009 Plan

October 20, 2008 at 8:36 am | Posted in 2009 plan! | 32 Comments

Let’s starting putting 2008 behind us and get onto 2009, and as if you didn’t already know, this is going to be one active offseason for LA. We can only say for sure that we know who three starting pitchers (Billingsley, Kershaw, Kuroda) and four batters (Loney, Martin, Kemp, and Ethier) are going to be – and even that’s subject to an unforeseen trade - so there’s a lot of work to be done.

According to the most excellent Cot’s Baseball Contracts (where I’m getting all of this payroll info from), the Dodgers payroll on Opening Day 2008 was $118.5 million, plus about $7.5 million for ex-Dodgers, making a total of roughly $126m. Coming off the books is about $54 million in Furcal, Lowe, Kent, Nomar, Penny, Saito, Beimel, and assorted lesser veterans.

So by my count, the Dodgers have about $72m committed to next year, although that’s likely go up a bit with some arbitration raises to guys like Martin, Proctor, Ethier, and Broxton. It’s always hard to tell exactly how that’s going to go, so let’s ballpark it at $80m. And yeah, the fact that $42.1m of it is going to Andruw Jones, Juan Pierre, and Jason Schmidt absolutely kills me. So were I to live out every fan’s dream and be a GM, here’s how I’d go about it. Let me just say, I know the numbers aren’t going to be perfect here – for example the $80m figure is my best estimate based on the figures I could find, and that sounds about right. I’m sure it’s off a few million either way, but it’s close enough for these purposes. I haven’t seen anything that says what the Dodgers are expecting their 2009 payroll to be, so I’m going to assume it’ll be about the same, but with room for a slight bump based on all the extra income the postseason and Manny-mania brought in – so let’s say up from $126m to $135m. For new contracts, I’m going to go with reasonable estimates. There’s an excellent chance that what happens in reality won’t really be near these, but since I’m not in the negotiating room, it’s the best I can do. I’m also trying to backload a little bit because after 2009, Jones and Schmidt’s awful deals are both off the books and that frees up huge amounts of cash.

One last disclaimer! This is what I would try to do, not what I think they will do. Basically, I’m going to try to figure out the best use of approximately $135 million, with $80m already committed and $55m free. Remember, with all of the other holes opening up (especially in the infield) that means you’re only going to be able to sign Manny or an ace starting pitcher, not both, unless you really want to see an infield next year of Loney/Abreu/Hu/DeWitt.

1. Re-sign Manny Ramirez to a 3 year, $70 million contract ($19m/$25.5m/$25.5m)
How can you possibly let him go after what he did this year? You’ve never seen a Dodger hitter like this, simply because there’s never been one. Besides, he brought in millions himself just in merchandise sales and all the postseason home games that never would have happened if he wasn’t around. We all know that McCourt values PR above all else, and the fans would kill him if he allowed Manny to walk. That said, I wouldn’t make sure to win at all costs; if some team decides to come along and blow up the market with a 4 or 5 year, $100+ million deal, then have a nice life, Manny (don’t give me the 6 year BS that Scott Boras is selling. There’s no prayer that happens). But I really don’t see that happening, because if you look at the big three teams, it’s possible that none will be in on the bidding. Clearly Boston won’t be there, and the Mets and Yankees might each be more interested in pitching. Not to mention – and yes, I know, money trumps all – there’s still the possibility that Manny decides he really would rather stay in a warm-weather, soft-media, heavily-Latino town where he’s already a god rather than going back East to the media fishbowl. 3 for $70m still represents a nice raise on the 2 for $40m team options that he wanted to be free of, so evil incarnate Scott Boras can still call this a “win”.
$80m + $19m =$99m

2. Re-sign Rafael Furcal to a 3 year, $45 million contract ($11m/$17m/$17m)
Yeah, this is a pretty dangerous one. The thought of giving Furcal all that money and having him get hurt yet again makes the heart skip a little. However, I think this could work. Furcal’s probably not going to get the long-term, huge money deal he wanted after missing most of this season, but this still represents a nice raise on the deal he’s just finished. It’s still possible that he could get a longer deal on the market since he did seem to prove his health in the playoffs, but back problems do tend to scare away suitors – and you’d like to hold out some naive hope that he feels some loyalty to the Dodgers for all the time he missed. From the Dodgers point of view, it’s not that hard to see how different the team was when he was in the lineup as opposed to injured. Remember Angel Berroa? Nomar? Yeah, I try to forget those days too. And if not Furcal, who? Chin-Lung Hu certainly didn’t prove he’s got the bat to take over, and the shortstop market is completely barren. Either way, all indications are that both sides want to make this work. Jon Heyman at SI.com suggests the Dodgers are likely to try to re-sign him, but he doesn’t say for what terms.
$99m + $11m = $110m

3a. Offer Casey Blake arbitration and cross your fingers that he declines. If he does…
I do NOT want to see Blake back as the starting 3B in 2009, but I would like to at least collect a draft pick for having to spend Carlos Santana and Jon Meloan. Blake will turn 36 next season and was on a pretty solid decline before being traded. And for all the talk about how he was “just as important as Manny”, let it be shown that his stats all dropped markedly once he arrived in LA, ending up with only a 97 OPS+.  He still has pop and can play multiple positions, so he’ll get a job somewhere – likely back in Cleveland. Let’s hope he does.
$110m + $0 (add 1 draft pick)

3b. …trade Scott Elbert, Greg Miller, Chin-Lung Hu, and Delwyn Young to Seattle for Adrian Beltre.
I can already feel how unpopular this one’s going to be. “But Scott Elbert’s just 22 and a talented lefty! You can’t trade guys like that!” I know, I know. Well, look. The Dodgers are clearly in “win now” mode after this year’s successes and the Mariners badly need to rebuild a moribund farm system, especially after last year’s brutal Erik Bedard deal. The Dodgers farm system isn’t as strong as it once was, due to the graduation of all our former prospects into vital parts of the team that aren’t getting moved, and do you want to trade Andrew Lambo or James McDonald? Me neither. So here the M’s get an excellent young pitching prospect in Elbert, a chance to take a flyer on a former top prospect in Miller – exactly what lousy teams ought to be doing – a good infield prospect in Hu (who I just blocked by re-signing Furcal, and anyway Ivan DeJesus, Jr. is nearly ready), and unfortunately, one of my favorite players in Delwyn Young, who’s just never going to get a shot with his hometown team and really ought to be a DH in the AL anyway – plus dumping Beltre’s salary and getting rid of a veteran who’s not interested in sticking around a rebuilding team. The Dodgers get back their old third baseman who’s been horribly underrated in Seattle – sure, he never matched his obscene 2004, but he’s still one of (if not the) best defensive 3B in baseball who’s still hit 25+ homers in each of his last three seasons. Yes, he does have a no-trade clause to eight teams including LA, but Beltre said in an interview that he would “be more than happy to come back to LA.”
$110m + $12m = $122m

4. Trade Juan Pierre and cash to either Cincinnati or the Chicago White Sox for either a mediocre prospect or a bench piece/bullpen arm.
Kudos to Pierre for not whining in September and October for not complaining when he was banished to the bench during the playoff run, but I can’t imagine that he’d be willing to go into 2009 as a bench player – and with Manny back, that’s exactly what he’d be. He’s already making noise about wanting to be moved if that’s the case, and with 3 years and about $28.5 million left on his deal, the contract is no longer an unmovable albatross (aka, “The Andruw Jones Special”). No, you can’t expect to get a whole bunch in return for him, but you’ll still be able to find a taker. The most likely landing spots? The White Sox, who have a question mark in center field and have made it clear they’d like some speed, would be one. Also, Cincinnati, which has holes in the outfield after dealing Adam Dunn and Ken Griffey, Jr., and who is managed by Dusty Baker – who not only had Pierre with the Cubs, but gave the excerable Corey Patterson (.238 OBP!) 155 plate appearances in the leadoff spot this year. Pierre’s a Hall of Famer compared to that! I wouldn’t mind taking Jeff Keppinger in return from the Reds; his stats were depressed this year because he returned too soon from injury, but he showed a decent bat in 2007 and I love guys who can play a lot of positions (everywhere but catcher and CF in his career). For the sake of our accounting, let’s say the Dodgers make the deal for Keppinger and have to kick in $3 million/year.
$122m – $6m = $116m

5. Offer Derek Lowe arbitration, but don’t re-sign him.
Everyone acts as though it’s a foregone conclusion that Lowe’s gone, and sadly, it probably is. He recently told Ken Rosenthal that he wants to go back to the east coast, and he told the Boston Globe‘s Nick Cafardo that Boston is very high on his list.  Don’t let this make you think that I don’t want Lowe back, because I very badly do, and if he’s willing to sign for something like 3/$45m, then I’d definitely do that. I just think he’s going to be an incredibly attractive alternative to Sabathia for some team that’s willing to give him something like 4/$75m, and I just can’t see fitting that into this budget.
$116m + $0 (add two draft picks)

6. Re-sign Nomar Garciaparra to a 1 year, $4 million contract.
Surprised? I bet you are. Me too! Hear me out on this one. After yet another injury-filled season, no one’s going to give Nomar a starting job. How could they? I can’t see that if the Dodgers made an offer, Nomar would be willing to leave his hometown (where’s he still immensely popular, no matter how he plays) with a young family in order to squeeze a few more dollars out elsewhere. Nomar can still hit lefties (.339/.424/.643 this year) and offers excellent positional flexibility, in addition to his PR value. For a small deal like this, it’s worth the risk, and anyway it’s not the end of the world if he spends a majority of the time on the DL.
$116m + $4m = $120m

7. Pick up Brad Penny’s option.
Speaking of surprises… yeah, I did say on September 26 to let him go, in the wake of his leaving the team after being placed on the DL. That was said a bit emotionally, and he did later return to the club during the playoffs. Let me first say, if it turns out that he’s more seriously injured than we know and he does need surgery, then forget it, buy him out. I’m going on the assumption that he’s not that seriously hurt, because as I detailed after his last appearance, dudes with bum shoulders don’t hit 96 on the gun. Nearly all of his problems seemed to be easily chalked up to rust, and I wouldn’t at all be surprised to find out for sure that placing him on the DL was simply because they needed the roster spot and didn’t think Penny would have a chance to pitch enough to work his way back into shape during a playoff push. So why am I picking this up? Two reasons, the first of which being, he was excellent as a Dodger before 2008. His ERA+ was better than league average in every year since he arrived in LA, and 2007 was fantastic at 16-4 with a 159 ERA+. I have a hard time believing that he’s just “lost it” – again, barring a more serious injury we don’t know about. The second reason is, it’s cheap. Since the $8.75m option has a $2m buyout, we’re only talking about $6.75m here. Do you really think you could go out and find a pitcher with his track record for one year, $6.75m? Of course not. This is exactly the kind of gamble a large-market team like the Dodgers should be taking.
$120m + $8.75m = $128.75m

8. Re-sign Greg Maddux to a 1 year, $5 million contract.
There’s been conflicting rumors about whether Maddux wants to return or not, but what is known is that he’d almost certainly only consider San Diego or Los Angeles. This would be taking just half of what he got in 2007, but when you’re narrowing your choices down like that, you don’t have a whole lot of leverage – and Maddux has never seemed like the type to only play for the cash. So what can you expect from him? While his ERA was a lousy 5.09 in LA last year, his WHIP was actually lower than it’s been since 2004. He might not be more than a five-inning pitcher, but if he can give you 30 starts of five league average innings, that’s worthwhile for a 5th starter – and to be honest, I’d give him $5 million just to talk to Kershaw, Billingsley, and McDonald all season long.
$128.75m + $5m = $133.75m

9. Re-sign Joe Beimel to a 2 year, $7 million contract.
Man, guessing what kind of contracts relievers will get is impossible. On one hand, Beimel made $1.925m in 2008, so this is a nice raise, but then you’ve also got insane deals like Scott Linebrink’s 4 year, $19m pact. So I might be way off on this one, but it seems like a fair deal on both sides. Beimel gets his first big deal, and the Dodgers get to retain one of the more reliable relievers in the National League over the last three years. Plus, Beimel seems to be pretty comfortable as a Dodger, and is more popular with the fanbase than any middle reliever really ought to be.
$133.75m + $3.5m = $137.25m

10. Sign Will Ohman to a 2 year, $5 million contract.
Ohman’s a 31-year old lefty reliever and Pepperdine alum who’s made it into at least 56 games in each of the last four seasons with the Cubs and Braves, with ERA+ marks of 151, 112, 94, and 112. Plus, he’s absolutely murder on lefties (.571 OPS against in 2008), which makes him unlike Beimel (who’s actually harder on righties) and Kuo (who kills everyone, but isn’t really a situational kind of guy). He just came off a 2 year, $2.5 million deal, so this doubles his salary.
$137.25m + $2.5m = $139.75m

11. Give Blake DeWitt first crack at the second base job.
In 112 at-bats after returning from the minors, DeWitt put up a .284/.402/.443 line with 4 homers, plus showed surprisingly good defense at second base. No one expects him to OBP over .400 over a full season, but that’s certainly a respectable line you can live with, especially when you consider he’d almost certainly be the 8th hitter in the lineup. If he can’t handle it, you’ve got some options behind him in Keppinger, Abreu, and DeJesus, Jr.

12. Re-sign Danny Ardoin to be the backup catcher. Or don’t. I don’t care.
Really, backup catcher doesn’t matter too much to a team like the Dodgers. Sure, it’d be great if we could go find a better backup that might nudge Torre into sitting Martin a little more, but the state of catching is so lousy right now that plenty of teams can’t even find a decent hitting starter, much less a backup. Like most journeymen backstops, Ardoin can’t hit but he’s a pretty decent receiver (unlike the 2008 debacle of Gary Bennett). So retain Ardoin, promote A.J. Ellis, anyone who’ll do the job for the minimum is fine by me.

13. Let Jason Repko and Xavier Paul fight it out for the 5th outfielder spot.
Yeah, this presupposes that Andruw Jones is going to be the 4th outfielder, which is a little messy – I just don’t see any way that he’s not on the roster other than flat out DFA’ing him, which won’t happen since that’ll leave McCourt on the hook for the rest of his deal. These guys each fit exactly what you want out of a 5th outfielder, which is strong defense, good speed, at least a decent bat – and cheap. There’s a case to be made for either one, and it’s not important to pick between the two here. Let spring training sort that out.

14. Goodbye, useless veterans.
Pablo Ozuna, Angel Berroa, Mark Sweeney, Tanyon Sturtze, Jason Johnson, and Gary Bennett, you don’t have to go home – but you can’t stay here.

15. Say goodbye to Takashi Saito.
This is a really, really tough thing to do. But he’s going to be 39 by the time next season starts, and he already missed a good chunk of this year with an elbow injury that more often than not requires surgery to fix. Plus, last offseason he said he considered not coming back for 2008 in order to spend more time with his family in Japan. Now if he’s willing to come back on another 1 year, $2 million contract, then I’m more than happy to do so. I just think the combination of his age + his questionable elbow + distance from home means that we’ve seen the last of Saito in blue. It won’t be a fun day when that happens.

16. Let Chan Ho Park walk.
He earlier said he’d leave LA to be a starter, here a scout says he’ll be a 2009 starter for someone, and he was terrible down the stretch (ERA of 6.00 in August, 6.52 in September). Hey, if he wants to come back to LA as a reliever for say, $1m, fine, but otherwise let’s just appreciate how well this $500k flyer worked out in 2008 and move on.

17. Start signing some of the young arbitration-eligible guys to long-term deals.
By now, you really ought to have a good idea of who’s going to be useful major leaguers. You can’t be going year to year on arbitration with all these guys, because you’re going to get killed. That’s the beauty of the long-term deal for young players. They get their first big payday sooner, and don’t have to worry about getting injured before making enough money to be set for life, and if the player performs to expectations, it saves the club money in the long run, plus gives them cost certainty for future planning rather than deal with the fluctuations of arbitration. So what’s the wait? I think we’ve all seen enough of guys like Martin, Billingsley, Kemp, etc. to know that we’d like to see them around for a while. In Colletti’s defense, he did approach Martin about this last season and was rebuffed, but we need to see a few of these guys locked up this offseason.

So after all of that, this is the team you’re looking at…

1. Furcal SS
2. Martin C
3. Manny LF
4. Ethier RF
5. Beltre 3B
6. Kemp CF
7. Loney 1B
8. DeWitt 2B
Bench: Nomar, IF  Keppinger, IF  Jones, CF  Repko/Paul, OF  Ardoin, C
Others: Abreu & DeJesus Jr. in AAA to take Nomar’s spot upon his first migraine

This team is similar to the lineup that terrorized the league after Manny was acquired, but it has the potential to be even better. Beltre is an upgrade on Blake, Furcal is a huge upgrade on Berroa, and you expect further improvement from the young guys. The bench has nice flexibility (especially in the infield), and with Repko/Paul each having strong arms, either would be a big upgrade on Pierre for Manny’s defensive replacement.

1. Billingsley RH
2. Kuroda RH
3. Kershaw LH
4/5. Penny/Maddux/McDonald/Schmidt RH & Stults LH

I know there’s going to be a lot of complaints that there’s no big-ticket free agent starter here to replace Lowe, but if you want to pay Manny there’s only so much you can fit into the budget. Sure, there’s a few question marks here, but there’s also a lot of depth. Here alone we’ve got 8 starting options, and that’s not even counting the inevitable non-roster veteran who shows up to become the 2009 recipent of the Scott Erickson/Aaron Sele/Chan Ho Park Memorial “I’m not dead yet!” award. Billingsley is a young ace, Kuroda was surprisingly effective, I’m really excited to see what Kershaw and McDonald can do over a full season, and if Penny’s not hurt and can return to a semblance of his former self, that’s a pretty dangerous rotation.

Broxton, RH
Beimel, LH
Kuo, LH
Ohman, LH
Wade, RH
Troncoso, RH
Proctor, RH

I can already hear the complaints about entrusting the closer’s role to Broxton, but I think that’s a pretty big overreaction. Let’s not forget that he was just 24 this year and was often dominating. We may have been spoiled a little by Eric Gagne and Saito this decade, but you ask opposing batters if they’re intimidated by Broxton throwing 99 MPH fastballs at their heads, and I think you know what the answer’s going to be. The pen has a nice lefty/righty mix, plus you figure one of the backend starters finds their way here as well.

So there you have it. We’ve spent $139.75 million, give or take, and also collected three extra draft picks. That payroll did end up a little higher than I intended it to be, and we didn’t even go get an ace starter. It’s unbelievable how much the bad contracts to Jones, Pierre, and Schmidt are just killing this team. Now go ahead, tear me apart. But don’t tell me that you wouldn’t rather see this crew out there than the real team that might feature Jason Varitek, eleven starts of Ben Sheets for $16 million/year, and Casey Blake.

- Mike Scioscia’s tragic illness msti-face.jpg

Advertisement

32 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. I was good with the first three moves. Couldn’t agree more, but I doubt the M’s take anything less than a package that includes either James McDonald or Andrew Lambo for Adrian. They need to restock their system and guys like Miller and Hu do not accomplish that. Right now, I see Adrian ending up in, either Minneapolis or San Francisco. Seeing as how the M’s are gonna be awful for a very long time, they can get a nice haul from the Giants, if they include Madison Bumgarner in the deal or from the Twins if they include either Denard Span or one of their multitude of young arms.

    I can be on board with Nomar, but I would see what Joe Crede will take for a one year deal or make a play for Bill Hall, as it appears he can be had for cheap with Mat Gamel on the cusp of being the Brewers’ third sacker.

    Can’t agree on Penny. I think we could sign Randy Johnson for a bit more and pass on Ohman. I would like to see Eric Stults get another chance in the pen or see if Brent Leach can make the jump from AA to the show, before spending $2.5 million per on another lefty.

    Regarding Slappy. I think we can deal him to the land of Doofy. But, if we are eating a sizable amount of contract, we can do better than Jeff Keppinger. My sights would be on Homer Bailey, who the Reds have really soured on. I like his arm and I gotta think that pitching half of his games in a real ballpark and not that little league field in Cincinnati would do wonders for his confidence and attitude.

    Now, if we get Bailey, I would test him as a closer candidate. I am that confident that Broxton will ever develop the killer instinct and while I think Kuo could be a shut down closer, he is not going to pitch back to back days. I agree on Sammy and it will be a sad day when he does pack it in.

    I am sure you have seen my choices for our 2009 roster. Peavy is my pipe dream and it would be grand to see him in Dodger Blue, but the cost of Kemp and McDonald, among others kind of forces us to run .161 out to center field….eek.

  2. Yeah, this was a lot harder than I thought it’d be. I can’t imagine the Reds would give up Homer Bailey for Juan Pierre, though. Bailey has fallen quite a bit, but still, the Reds won’t give up on him for Pierre.

  3. I love the idea of bringing Beltre back to LA. The lineup you post there is one that I think could compete for the NL pennant. If Kuo is injured though, middle relief would be a major hole, especially of Elbert is gone via trade.

    I don’t think Seattle wants Hu, they already have Betancourt who is young, plays good (they used to say great but he’s decline for some reason) defense and cant’ really hit.

  4. I think your fatal flaw is that you assume Frank McCourt is a competent owner who cares about winning enough to spend money. :o
    -
    But Beltre? Yeah, you’re going to get hate for it. :p I don’t really mind giving up Elbert, really, but I sorta mind trading for that dude. If it’s the defense you want, then DeWitt is close. Might as well just offer Orlando Hudson a contract at 2nd. :o

  5. But there’s no way DeWitt is close to Beltre on offense.

  6. I don’t think he’s close on defense either. DeWitt is definitely a very good defender, but Beltre remains elite.

  7. I agree on Bailey, I would figure we would have to eat more contract or force someone like Proctor down the Reds’ throats. Seeing as how the Reds could use a warm body to get to Cordero, I suggest Slappy, some $9 million and Proctor for Bailey and a boudoir picture of Marge Schott.

    Just ruminate on that mental image for a while and see if that doesn’t ruin your day or week.

  8. One problem, and my fear. What reason does MCcourt have to really invest in this team? During the season he was only willing to take on players that he wouldn’t have to pay (Manny,Blake,Berroa). We won the division by winning 84 games, why send out a team with 95 win talent out there amidst a failing economy? I hate to say it, but right now we desperately need the Giants. The Dodgers won’t have to anti up until someone else in the division does, think AL east. But I like resigning Manny, Furcal, trading for Beltre, and locking up the young guys, that is really the key.

  9. Beltre idea is great, but I too agree on picking up Randy Johnson. The guy can still hurl and is 5 wins shy of 300 and will be able to mentor the young ones too. I don’t agree with giving Maddux $5 mil though, as he is not worth a damn as a pitcher. If he wants to be a bench coach then do it because their salaries don’t count torwards payroll!

    Casey Blake will definitely decline arbitration so that will be a pick right there. Furcal returning would be goo as well, but I’d offer $40 mil instead of $45.

    Lastly, I do not think a Ben Sheets signing is that bad of an idea. It sounds bad, but I just really like that guy a lot.

  10. I’m pretty sure Beimel is a Type B free agent and is so, there’s no reason to bring him back.

    Seattle would never accept that package for Beltre.

    I’d rather go after Randy Johnson than spend eight million on Brad Penny. Unlike Penny, RJ can still pitch (133 tRA+/3.73 FIP last season) and his mechanics are very, very good.

  11. Mike, why should what type of free agent Beimel is have anything to do with whether we bring him back? It only matters if they decided NOT to bring him back.

  12. I would love to have Beimel back, but I am not a huge fan of giving $2+ million per season in a multi-year deal to a loogy. It just smacks of watching the Orioles load their bullpen with guys like Baez, Bradford and Walker, for huge money, and none of them were closers or starters.

    I think we have enough young arms in our pen, along with Proctor (if we keep him) and Saito (if he stays) to not worry about overpaying for a loogy, when it is obvious we need a third baseman, a backup catcher (please be Josh Bard – I would feel somewhat safer with him as backup, because if Russell gets hurt, I don’t like the idea of Ardoin or AJ Ellis catching on a daily basis) and a decent right handed bat off of the bench who can play first and won’t cost us over $5 million.

  13. a good detailed look at the pen and the starting staff would be great. Right now it looks like

    Kershaw
    Kuroda
    McDonald

    will be in the rotation, that leaves a #1 and a #4 starter to be found. Is that right?

  14. Beimel is worth more if he signs somewhere else than if we brought him back. He’s just an average LOOGY. You shouldn’t give average LOOGYs multimillion dollar contracts, especially not when you could get a supplemental pick for one.

  15. Harold, that’s not right, you forgot about Chad Billingsley who fulfills your question of a #1 starter. As far as the others go, are you saying that you’d like a #4 starter because Kershaw/Kuroda/McDonald can all be other team’s #2 or #3 starters?

  16. Harold, don’t forget about bills.

    Overall that would be a great team playing in la. I just don’t think that manny would sign for anything less than 5 years.

  17. McDonald will not be a starter opening day. He’ll be a spot starter and will likely be in the rotation at the end of the year depending on how it plays out. Look for him to be in the 2010 season. They will likely want to ease him into the rotation via the pen, ala Bills and Kershaw.

  18. haha yeah I totally messed that up, sorry, need to quit drinking.

  19. One of the biggest things is that we are careful to not let a big Manny contract continue up into the free agent years of the majority of our young guys. Would hate to lose one of them because we can’t afford em. That it a reason we should look into locking up the young guys. Loney and Kemp really need to be locked up before they start to hit for power, cause at that point their value skyrockets.

  20. I think I would like to hang onto a few of those prospects and not trade for Beltre. I’d rather move either Jones or Pierre for Eric Chavez. High risk/high reward. He can platoon with Nomar at third. Everything else I like… except for that Penny thing. Let him go. Having too many guys would confuse Torre as to who has what role. I also like the possibility of adding Randy Johnson instead of Maddux. Infact I think I read somewhere that Maddux prefered to become a bench coach next year. I’d love that!

  21. Mike-I think Beltre’s power fools a lot of people into believing that he’s still a really productive hitter. He should put up an .800 OPS or so, but so would Casey Blake in a 1-2 year time frame. It’s plausible that DeWitt learns to do the same, albeit in a totally different way.
    -
    Harold-Beltre is elite. Best in the league actually. He’s at a +32 rating. Thing is, if you extrapolate DeWitt’s numbers to the same innings, he’s about +24-26 as well. Not that much different.
    -
    Adding Hudson instead would also provide elite defense at 2nd base, while DeWitt is below average defensively at 2nd. Not that I really like Hudson, I just don’t really know what to think about Beltre.

  22. The only other thing about Beltre is that we have to trade for him. I don’t mind giving up the guys listed, but that’s assuming that somebody intelligent did a deal.
    -
    In real life, unfortunately, Ned Colletti will be doing the deal, so he’ll probably trade DeWitt, McDonald and Kemp for him.

  23. Good plan, MSTI. I think I’d probably prefer Randy Johnson to Maddux, as others here have suggested, and I’m a little leery about your resultant starting pitching, which looks weak on paper to me. However, what is likely to happen will include at least one jaw-dropping surprise; of that I’m certain.

  24. What gives any of you the idea that Randy Johnson would want to sign with LA? Greg Maddux wants to stay in Southern California and I love having him here, like MSTI said, I’d pay him his salary just to have him talk to Kershaw, McDonald, and Billingsley all season long.

  25. I can’t disagree with anything MSTI posted, except giving Beimel $7 million over two years is a little excessive. My one question would be the number of draft picks that Casey Blake would bring back if he declined arbitration and went somewhere else. Shouldn’t he bring back two picks instead of one? Maybe I missed something, but I thought he hit somewhere close to .270 with about 20 HRs and 80 RBI.

  26. Dude, it’s because according to mlbtraderumors.com, Lowe is a Type A free agent (2 draft picks) while Blake will be a Type B (1 draft pick.

  27. FireCross-Speculation has him wanting to stay on the West Coast. It’s only speculation though.

  28. Yes, but I can’t believe that Blake would only be a Type B. Wasn’t that website the same one that had Lowe as a Type B for months?

  29. Beautiful game plan. My only changes would be replacing Maddux with Randy Johnson, Ardoin with Ellis and bring Saito back.

  30. [...] you that I’m not in favor of this move, since I already advocated picking up his option in my 2009 plan, but I still think this is a huge mistake. This is what I said in that post: Let me first say, if [...]

  31. [...] all that in mind, here’s the official MSTI Plan for 2010. Just like last year, this is what I’d do if I were GM, not what I think they will do. This is always the longest [...]

  32. [...] first brought him up way back in October 2008, before any rumors had attached him to the Dodgers, in my 2009 plan: Ohman’s a 31-year old lefty reliever and Pepperdine alum who’s made it into at least 56 games [...]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,102 other followers