NLDS Roster Announced

October 7, 2009 at 11:50 am | Posted in 2009 NLDS vs. Cardinals, Jeff Weaver | 2 Comments

Hot off the presses…

The Dodgers will carry 11 pitchers and 14 position players. The roster is as follows:
 
Pitchers (11)
Ronald Belisario, RHP  
Chad Billingsley, RHP 
Jonathan Broxton, RHP
Jon Garland, RHP    
Clayton Kershaw, LHP  
Hong-Chih Kuo, LHP      
Vicente Padilla, RHP
George Sherrill, LHP
Ramon Troncoso, RHP
Jeff Weaver, RHP
Randy Wolf, LHP

Catchers (2)
Russell Martin
Brad Ausmus

Infielders (8) 
Ronnie Belliard    
Casey Blake                                         
Juan Castro
Rafael Furcal (S)                                  
Orlando Hudson (S)
James Loney (L)
Mark Loretta
Jim Thome (L)

Outfielders (4)
Andre Ethier (L)
Matt Kemp
Juan Pierre (L)
Manny Ramirez

Quick thoughts:

1) Surprised – pleasantly – to see 11 pitchers rather than 12. With Thome only a pinch-hitter, flexibility would have been strictly limited.

2) Jeff Weaver makes the cut, and James McDonald doesn’t. He was an afterthought down the stretch – just 7.1 innings since August 30th – so it’s a surprise to see him making the squad.

3) We just can’t shake the corpse of Mark Loretta, can we?

What the What?

October 6, 2009 at 3:35 pm | Posted in 2009 NLDS vs. Cardinals, Chad Billingsley, Orlando Hudson, Ronnie Belliard, Vicente Padilla | 4 Comments

belliardhits.jpgLineups for Game 1 of the NLDS are in: (hat tip Dodger Thoughts)

Rafael Furcal, SS
Matt Kemp, CF
Andre Ethier, LF
Manny Ramirez, LF
James Loney, 1B
Casey Blake, 3B
Ronnie Belliard, 2B
Russell Martin, C
Randy Wolf, P

Wait, Belliard over Orlando Hudson? They had basically shared the job for the month of September, so on the surface that shouldn’t be all that surprising. But what is surprising is that you absolutely have to start Belliard in Game 2 against Adam Wainwright, just based on what I wrote in my “reasons to be happy to face the Cardinals” post a few days ago:

3) The Dodgers have a great history of hitting Adam Wainwright.

Six Dodgers have had eleven or more at-bats in their careers against Wainwright, and five have had great success – and the one who hasn’t is Brad Ausmus, who won’t be facing him anyway.

dodgersstatsvswainwright.jpgLook at those OPS numbers! What will be really interesting will be the second base decision in that game; as you can see, Ron Belliard has done very well against Wainwright, but Orlando Hudson, who would have been next on this list, has just one hit in ten at-bats against him. 

There’s no way you don’t start Belliard against Wainwright in Game 2; not only has he hit him in the (admittedly small sample size) past, but Hudson has had terrible luck against him. That being the case, are you really going to start Belliard the first two games and relegate Hudson to a full-fledged bench player? Neither one can hit Chris Carpenter a lick (combined 1 single in 14 tries), so there’s no sense in playing the numbers there.

I suppose this also means the Dodgers are confident in Belliard’s hamstring, despite his missing a week and getting just one at-bat in the season finale. Or maybe it was just the fact that Hudson ended the season on a 1-13 tear that caused them to make that call. So I’m okay with this, as long as Belliard starts in Game 2 as well.

In other news, a bit of a surprise comes with Vicente Padilla being named the Game 3 starter over Chad Billingsley, with Billingsley going in Game 4. You’d think I’d be mad about this - the veteran retread picked up for free getting the nod over the talented young star who I’ve advocated for.

But you know what? I’m not. Billingsley still gets a start – this isn’t Padilla and Jon Garland over Billingsley – and Padilla was so dominant against the Rockies on Sunday that it’s hard to not want to see that again. Besides, Padilla’s had great success against these Cardinals, allowing just one homer in 73 plate appearances (and that to Troy Glaus, who might not even play) and has been especially crushing to Mark DeRosa, who’s hitting just .182 in 24 shots against Padilla.

So I get it. And I don’t mind it that much. I just can’t wrap my head around the fact that Vicente Padilla is the Game 3 starter in the NLDS. Not Chad Billingsley. Not Hiroki Kuroda. Vicente Padilla. Face=melt.

God, I love the playoffs.

Even When Ken Rosenthal Is Right, He’s Wrong

October 6, 2009 at 11:00 am | Posted in 2009 NLDS vs. Cardinals, Ken Rosenthal, Ramon Troncoso | 2 Comments

EVERYONE STOP WHAT YOU’RE DOING AND PAY ATTENTION.

I HAVE A VERY IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT TO MAKE.

wait for it…

wait for it…

KEN ROSENTHAL IS PICKING THE DODGERS!

I know! I can’t believe it either! And he’s actually got facts! Like:

But remember, the Dodgers had the best regular-season record in the National League and the best run differential in the majors.

It’s true! They do! So let’s all celebrate a national writer finally choosing the Dodgers to win an NLDS that is so obviously going to be swept by the Cardinals (in just two games, no less) that they shouldn’t even throw the first pitch. Thank you, Ken, for your confidence.

Oh. What’s that? Ahhh… crap. He’s basing his choice on flawed ideas. This is a new one for me – I don’t usually try to pick apart arguments about how the Dodgers are good – but, hell, if i’m going to do it to negative articles I should do it to positive ones too, right?

Rather than go through every line, let’s just point out the main reasons why Rosenthal thinks the Dodgers could win:

At that point, the Dodgers’ bullpen advantage will become even more significant, particularly if their starters can last at least six innings.

The Dodger pen is without question excellent… but you’ll notice I didn’t mention any bullpen advantage in my post about reasons to be happy to be facing St. Louis. That’d be because, even though the Dodger bullpen is great, so is St. Louis’. In fact, Baseball Prospectus believes that the Cardinal pen might actually be better. What they’ve done is ignore the overall seasonal stats, because each team had a ton of guys contribute over the last 6 months who are either no longer with the team or won’t be on the playoff roster. They’ve taken just the top 4 relievers (in LA’s case, Broxton, Troncoso, Sherrill, and Kuo) and also, for guys like Sherrill who were in-season acquisitions, extrapolated their worth over the full year to make it fair. What do we get?      

So, strange as this might seem, it’s the Twins–if they make it–and the Cardinals who are sitting pretty with the best pens in their respective leagues. Just as the Cards boast the best quartet for starting their games, they also have the best foursome to take on the lion’s share of their key late-game frames. The Yankees, Red Sox, and Dodgers have nothing to be ashamed of, the Rockies are hoping their late-season reinforcements can make the difference, the Angels and Tigers aren’t in a good way, and the Phillies are a complete wild card.

By this measure, the Dodgers pen isn’t better than the Cardinals’, and in fact might not even be as good. I tend to think it’s largely irrelevant because they each have excellent relievers, but the take-home point here is that you can’t blindly assume the Dodgers have a huge advantage.

Back to Rosenthal:

Ramon Troncoso, Ron Belisario, Hong-Chi Kuo, George Sherrill and Jonathan Broxton — the Dodgers’ bullpen features one power arm after another.

Yes. Definitely.

The Cardinals?

Their bullpen statistics, for the most part, are outstanding. But their relievers remain relatively inexperienced in their respective roles.

Right-handers Jason Motte and Blake Hawksworth are rookies. Righty Kyle McClellan, the principal setup man, is in his second season. Ryan Franklin, a first-time closer at age 36, had a 7.56 ERA in September.

And here’s where the comparison starts to falter. You can’t complain that Motte, Hawksworth, and McClellan are inexperienced, and not point out that the career innings by Troncoso and Belisario entering the season were just 38, all by Troncoso. If it bothers you that Franklin had a lousy September, then it should bother you that Troncoso’s been giving up nearly an .800 OPS in the second half.

Moving on:

Carpenter and Wainwright pitch deep enough into games to limit the bullpen’s exposure. But Joel Pineiro, the team’s Game 3 starter, has a 4.98 ERA in his last seven starts. And John Smoltz and Kyle Lohse, the leading choices for Game 4, are five- or six-inning pitchers.

Boy, this sounds familiar.. let’s think about this another way.

Wolf and Kershaw pitch deep enough into games to limit the bullpen’s exposure. But Chad Billingsley, the team’s Game 3 starter, has a 5.45 ERA in his last seven games. And Vicente Padilla and Jon Garland, the leading choices for Game 4, were cheap late-season additions.

So all of a sudden the Dodger starting pitching isn’t a problem? Again, I do realize how absolutely insane it sounds that I’m getting on Rosenthal for not getting on the Dodgers. It’s crazy. I know this. I’m just saying, that if he’s going to pick the Dodgers to win, do it for the right reasons!

FOX Sports Does Not Understand Baseball

October 5, 2009 at 6:45 pm | Posted in 2009 NLDS vs. Cardinals | 4 Comments

Pointing out that the Dodgers are consistently underrated by the national media is hardly news – every Dodger blog alive points it out constantly – but FOX has really outdone themselves this time. I get that the Dodgers may not be the Yankees, and had a lousy last week or two, but you’re really going to call the team with the best record in the league 7th out of 8 playoff teams?

Even better, their facts are inherently flawed.

There are just too many rotation issues and offensive woes to trust the Dodgers. They’re arguably playing the worst of any team, regardless of league, going into the playoffs. Manny Ramirez can immediately change that if he gets hot, but his performance over the final week doesn’t lend confidence to that happening. The rotation is very unsettled and doesn’t stack up well to the Cardinals’ and Phillies’. At their core, the Dodgers are a very talented team, but they’re just not playing well enough in any one facet to think they’ll get more than two wins this postseason.

Well, FOX, I reject your reality and substitute my own.

Fact: for all the hand-wringing over the Dodgers’ struggle to clinch the NL West, the Cardinals fared even worse. In September and October, St. Louis was 14-16. The Dodgers were 16-13.

Fact: it’s been proven many times, but probably none better than Jay Jaffe on Baseball Prospectus today, that how a team ends a regular season has very little impact on a postseason:

As the postseason unfolds over the next few weeks, you’re going to hear a lot about momentum and its importance to a ballclub, and while it’s undoubtedly a good idea to bear Earl Weaver’s famous maxim in mind, the take-home message is that the conventional wisdom that a team’s recent performances foreshadows their playoff fate is generally wrong. The fact that there are no shortage of pundits who elevate the 2007 Rockies as their evidence while forgetting the 2006 Cardinals underscores either how little attention some talking heads pay to actual results, or how short their attention spans are.

Fact: Sean Forman of the imcomparable baseball-reference.com has derived a formula including a team’s margin of victory and quality of opponent – just like NCAA football’s BCS rankings and determined that the Dodgers are the best team in the NL by far:

These ratings show the Dodgers to be a legitimate 95-win team and the best team in the National League by a wide margin. The Rockies and Phillies have 86-to-88-win talent with the series leaning in the Phillies’ direction because they are slightly better and they have home-field advantage. The Cardinals grade out as the worst of the playoff teams with 83 wins against an average schedule.

Cardinals fans will, I’m sure, be up in arms at this characterization. By our measures, the Cardinals pitchers faced the second-easiest set of lineups and the batters faced the easiest set of pitching staffs, meaning they had the easiest schedule by a wide margin. (The Cy Young candidacies for Chris Carpenter and Adam Wainwright are another discussion.) In addition to playing in the N.L. Central where the next best team ranked 18th in the majors, the Cardinals faced the A.L.’s worst division, the Central, in interleague play.

Not that I mind playing the underdog, but does it always have to be that way? Will the Dodgers ever get some proper respect?

Time to Predict That NLDS Roster

October 5, 2009 at 9:40 am | Posted in 2009 NLDS vs. Cardinals | 7 Comments

I’ve been wanting to write this post for weeks, but with the, you know, horrible slump and near epic collapse, it seemed in poor taste. So now, finally, I can do one of my favorite things, and start predicting some rosters. But first, by all means, please go visit Sons of Steve Garvey and check out their collection of celebration pictures from the clinching night, which they always kill the rest of us on – when they’re not hiding secret hints to their puzzles in my blog, that is.

So here, hopefully, is what the roster for the 2009 NL West Division Champion Los Angeles Dodgers (I will never get sick of writing that) could look like. As always, you get 25 active players, and it’s almost always a hitter/pitcher split of either 14/11 or 13/12.


ethierchampagne.jpgStone Cold Locks (starting lineup)
1. Russell Martin C
2. James Loney 1B
3. Orlando Hudson 2B
4. Casey Blake 3B
5. Rafael Furcal SS
6. Manny Ramirez LF
7. Matt Kemp CF
8. Andre Ethier RF

Stone Cold Locks (pitchers)
9. Clayton Kershaw SP
10. Randy Wolf SP
11. Jonathan Broxton CL
12. George Sherrill RP
13. Ramon Troncoso RP
14. Ronald Belisario RP
15. Hong-Chih Kuo RP

10 guys to go! Let’s start with the obvious bench players – Brad Ausmus, Juan Pierre, and Ronnie Belliard. That gets you up to 18 players, 7 of which are pitchers. Time to beef up the pitching staff.

19. Chad Billingsley

He probably should be on the “locks” list, because not only do I think he deserves a playoff start, with Hiroki Kuroda missing the NLDS, there’s no way you can afford to not use Billingsley. He’s pitching in a simulated game on Monday, which would line him up for Game 3, but what’s really noteworthy are his two starts against the Cardinals this year. How many times have I said lately that I don’t mind if he’s outstanding for 5 innings because the bullpen is good enough to pick him up? Well, look at this line from MLB.com about Billingsley vs. St. Louis:

Billingsley started twice against the Cardinals this year. He took a strange loss in St. Louis July 28, pitching five scoreless innings, then imploding in a six-run sixth. But he rebounded Aug. 18 by allowing two runs in six innings of a 7-3 win.

If that’s what he is right now, fine. I’ll take five outstanding innings every time in the playoffs. You just can’t afford to skip him.

20. Jon Garland

From that same article about Billingsley, Joe Torre uses the dreaded word to praise Garland: “grittiness”. So you can guarantee that he’s going to make the roster, and possibly be the Game 4 starter. Garland’s actually been decent since coming to LA before blowing up in his last start against San Diego, and he’s got that “veteran-ness” Torre loves, including having pitched in a World Series, so he’ll make it.

Ideally, you’d like to sweep and not have to bother with Jon Garland at all, but if it comes down to Game 4 being an elimination game, the schedule is favorable in that you might not need to use a 4th starter. With Randy Wolf starting Game 1 on Wednesday, you could bring him back on 3 days rest on Sunday. You don’t really want to bring him back on short rest – he’s only done it once in his career – but it’s an option, if needed. More likely, Garland’s getting that start, though.

We’re now up to 11 hitters and 9 pitchers. Time to add a name that probably should have been on the “locks” list, but I just couldn’t bring myself to do it:

21. Juan Castro

I can’t believe that a 37-year-old non-roster backup infielder who’s consistently one of the worst hitters in baseball is going to be such an unquestioned choice, but he’s your only backup shortstop. Belliard’s only played 10 games at SS in his career, and you certainly don’t want his glove there in a big spot, so it has to be Castro. Great. I guess?

22. James McDonald

This might seem like an odd choice, but Torre really seems to trust the guy. Besides, remember his performance in the NLCS last year?

One amazingly huge bright point, if not so much for this postseason as for next year and beyond: James McDonald. The kid – he’s still only 23, although Clayton Kershaw has skewed our perception of “kid” a little – was a last-minute addition to the playoff roster after getting all of five September innings in four games. Almost exclusively a starter in the minors, even his relief appearances for the Dodgers came with him entering the game at the start of an inning. But tonight, having not pitched in two weeks, he comes in as the fourth pitcher of the third inning of NLCS Game 2… with the bases loaded, Phillies fans going nuts, and slugger Burrell at the plate in Philly’s bandbox park. Recipe for disaster, right? But no! McDonald strikes out Burrell, and proceeds to go three more scoreless innings, striking out four others and giving up just two hits. What an absolutely phenomenal effort by this kid, and he’s really thrown his hat into the ring for a starting rotation gig next year – he’s unscored upon in 8.1 MLB innings.

He was pretty horrible in a few early-season starts, and as late as July 27, his ERA was still 5.34. Since then? He’s been great, with a 2.70 ERA and a 32/12 K/BB rate in 30 innings. He’ll make it.

3 spots left, and there’s 12 hitters and 10 pitchers. There’s going to be 11 pitchers at a minimum, so let’s fill one of those spots first. Competitors include Guillermo Mota, Vicente Padilla, Jeff Weaver, and Scott Elbert. Earlier in the year, I might have thought Weaver was more of a lock, but he’s been pretty forgotten in September, getting into just 5 games. So I don’t think he’s got much shot, especially since, as you’ll see, there’s already a few guys who can go multiple innings. 

So it’s Padilla, Elbert, or Mota for this spot. You could make cases for all three, and I went back and forth a few times, but after yesterday’s game…

23. Vicente Padilla

My original version of this list had him as possibly getting the last spot, but most likely being left off. However, he was so awesome yesterday – 10 K in 5 IP – that I can’t see any way they leave him off, especially when they’re just going to look at the numbers, “4-0, 3.20″. I have no idea if he can be as effective out of the bullpen, though the idea of having him start to get loose in the 3rd inning of Billingsley’s start to be ready to enter in the 6th is an interesting one.

Padilla may have actually gotten himself back into consideration for a Game 4 start after his great outing yesterday and Garland’s lousy last start. I’d still rather have Wolf in Game 4 and Kershaw in Game 5 than either of these two, though. Even better, if that happens,  at least we’ll have 3 guys in the pen (Garland, Padilla, McDonald) who can go multiple innings.


thomebattingpractice.jpg24. Jim Thome

This was actually a tougher call than you’d think, because I don’t think he really deserves a spot. He can’t run or play the field, he’s been injured, and he hasn’t even taken to pinch hitting all that well – just 4 for 17. That said, he’ll make the team because you don’t go out and trade for a Jim Thome, pay him $2 million for one month of work, and then not include him on the playoff roster. That’s why he will make it; the reason he should make it is simply because if the Dodgers do make it to the World Series, you absolutely want him to be your DH, and you can’t not include him on the first two rounds on the playoffs, not let him hit for three weeks, and then expect him to show up cold and hit in the World Series.

We’re now up to the last spot, and at 13 hitters and 11 pitchers, and this is going to be exceedingly though. Torre kept just 11 pitchers last year in the NLDS, but this year it’s not hard at all to think he’d want 12. However, Thome is exclusively a pinch-hitter, so you don’t want to be shorthanded in the field.

Competitors for this spot: Guillermo Mota, Scott Elbert, Mark Loretta, Doug Mientkiewicz, and Blake DeWitt. Time for some process of elimination…

I’d love to see DeWitt make the squad, but with three guys who can handle 3B already (Blake, Belliard, Castro) plus with how underwhelming he’s been this year, I just don’t see it happening. Out.

Mientkiewicz is definitely a “Torre guy”, but he was hurt the entire year and only ended up with 20 at-bats. I like his versatility, but he’s not going to survive a roster crunch like this. Out

Mota’s had a bizarre season – horrible for two months, great for two months, then mediocre/injured for two months, and I originally had him on my list. But he’s pitched just four times since returning from the DL over two weeks ago, and got lit up in one of those times. With how strong the rest of the pen is and with Garland and Padilla likely both making it, I just don’t see room for him. Out.

Which brings us to Scott Elbert and Mark Loretta. Elbert has all the talent in the world, but but his 5.03 ERA doesn’t look very good. However, don’t forget that A) much of that is from his disastrous April stint, in which he allowed 5 runs in 6.1 innings, and B) ERA can be very misleading for relievers, due to their short outings. Since his return in July, Elbert’s held opponents to just a .191/.283/.277 line, and has been far more effective against lefties than righties. With St. Louis having such a hard time against lefties, as I said yesterday, it’s not at all a bad idea to have that third lefty in the pen.

Meanwhile, Loretta’s been nothing short of horrible. We’ve been calling him out for that all season. His .585 OPS is unacceptable for a guy who’s supposed to be a bat off the bench, and he’s not even hitting lefties that well. Sure, he can play 1st and 3rd, but if we’re taking him to be a 4th 3B, then I’d rather have DeWitt, who’s a superior fielder.

The one thing Loretta has going for him is that he’s a “veteran” who’s “been there before” and is a Torre guy. Make sure to note, though, that his “being there before” is just 3 games in the 2005 NLDS, in which he contributed a few singles as the Padres were swept out by the Cardinals. He has nothing to contribute, so the 25th spot should go to…

25. Scott Elbert

You need the third lefty against the Cardinals. You don’t need a veteran bat who can’t hit or really field, because you kind of already have that with Jim Thome. That said, I have absolutely no doubt that they’re going to take Loretta anyway.

So here it is, friends – what the 25 man roster against the Cards should be:

Batters (13)
C Martin, Ausmus
IF Loney, Hudson, Blake, Furcal, Belliard, Castro, Thome
OF Manny, Kemp, Ethier, Pierre   

Pitchers (12)
SP Wolf, Kershaw, Billingsley
SP/longmen – Garland, Padilla
LH RP - Sherrill, Kuo, Elbert
RH RP – Broxton, Belisario, Troncoso, McDonald

 

Reasons To Be Happy About Facing St. Louis

October 4, 2009 at 4:15 pm | Posted in 2009 NLDS vs. Cardinals, Adam Wainwright | 2 Comments

Yes, we’d have preferred to see the Phillies.

Yes, the idea of facing Chris Carpenter & Adam Wainwright on the mound and inhuman cyborg Albert Pujols & Matt Holliday at the plate is pretty daunting.

Yes, I still hate that you can’t face teams in your own division in the first round, because the Dodgers have owned Colorado and of the three NL teams, St. Louis is by far the one I’d wanted to avoid the most.

But despite what all of the so-called “experts” might think, there are actually good reasons to be happy about seeing the Cardinals coming in to town for the NLDS, some with a slight helping of Dodger-blue optimism. Follow me! To freedom!

ankielstrikesout.jpg1) The Cardinals are an absolute joke against left-handed pitching.

It sounds crazy to say that when you’ve got righty sluggers like Pujols and Holliday on your team, but it’s true. Believe it or not, the Cardinals are actually the worst team in baseball hitting against left-handed pitchers. Their horrible team line of .234/.312/.365 adds up to just a .677 OPS, tied with San Diego for dead last behind two punchless teams landing just ahead of them – San Francisco and Pittsburgh.

And, hey! Guess what! Randy Wolf and Clayton Kershaw are going to start Games 1 and 2! And they’re lefties!

This doesn’t really impact Pujols and Holliday, because they kill everyone. Mark DeRosa’s fine against lefties, too (.824 OPS), but everyone else is a total disaster. Khalil Greene, Rick Ankiel, Colby Rasmus and Skip Schumacher all have OPS’s under .600, which is just horrible. The other likely Cardinal starters – Yadier Molina, Brendan Ryan, Ryan Ludwick, and Julio Lugo – range from “mediocre” to “decent at best”. Advantage: Dodgers.

2) The three Dodger pitchers who’ve seen Pujols the most – Randy Wolf, Jonathan Broxton, and Chad Billingsley – have done a good job of containing him.

Those three have seen Pujols 47 times. They’ve allowed him just 8 hits,
and only two of those were doubles – no homers. Broxton in particular
has been effective against Pujols, allowing just one hit and two walks
in twelve plate appearances. (The bad news is, Holliday’s destroyed
both Wolf and Billingsley; but this is supposed to be a “good news”
column.)

Pujols is awesome, so you know he’s going to get his at some point. The idea is just to make sure that he doesn’t single-handedly win the series, and we can at least point to three big cogs of the pitching machine who’ve shown they might just have a chance of doing exactly that.

3) The Dodgers have a great history of hitting Adam Wainwright.

Six Dodgers have had eleven or more at-bats in their careers against Wainwright, and five have had great success – and the one who hasn’t is Brad Ausmus, who won’t be facing him anyway.

dodgersstatsvswainwright.jpgLook at those OPS numbers! What will be really interesting will be the second base decision in that game; as you can see, Ron Belliard has done very well against Wainwright, but Orlando Hudson, who would have been next on this list, has just one hit in ten at-bats against him. 

4) The Cardinals have a very unbalanced lineup.

Pujols is, of course, a beast. He’s the best player in baseball, and Holliday’s been excellent since coming in a midseason trade. But other than them? No one’s that consistent. I’ve been a huge DeRosa fan for years, but he hit just .193 in September and has an injured wrist, so he’s hardly to be counted on. Meanwhile, when the Dodgers are right, they have a lineup where anyone 1-8 can hurt you.

Look at the top 10 in VORP for each team on offense. Two things should jump out at you; one is that the Cardinals have so many hitters in negatives for VORP that pitcher Adam Wainwright actually makes the cut. The second? Look how much of their offense is dependent on Pujols and Holliday.
2009cardinalsVORP.jpg

Meanwhile, look at the same chart for the Dodgers:
2009dodgersVORP.jpgAmong each team’s top 10, the Cardinals have just two guys who contributed more than 10% – you know who. The Dodgers have five. The point is, if you can neutralize Pujols and Holliday – no easy feat, of course – then the rest of the Cardinal lineup isn’t that scary. You can’t really say the same for the Dodgers, because there’s quite a few guys who can hurt you.

5) Those jerks owe us for 2004 – and especially 1985.

Up until last season, the Dodgers’ 2004 playoff appearance was mostly known for Jose Lima’s complete game shutout in Game 3 of the NLDS, the Dodgers first playoff victory since winning it all in 1988. I mostly remember it as yet another playoff embarrassment. So there’s that. However, 2004 was nothing compared to the only other time these two teams met, in the 1985 NLCS, which might be the most crushing loss in Dodger playoff history. As we all remember, the Dodgers were up 2-0 before Tom Niedenfuer gave up game-winning homers in the 9th to Ozzie Smith in Game 5 and then Jack Clark in Game 6.

The Dodgers have never beaten St. Louis in the playoffs. I’d say it’s our turn.

I think – no, I know – that all of the national media are going to write off the Dodgers. “They don’t have Chris Carpenter. They don’t have Adam Wainwright. They don’t have Albert Pujols. Manny Ramirez is a cheater who can’t hit anymore.” Hey, maybe they’re right. But let’s not forget there’s some pretty compelling reasons to actually let the games be played.

Coming tomorrow! The playoff roster predictions I’ve been holding onto for weeks for fear of enlarging the already epic jinx this team looked to have been playing under.

Game 1 Of NLDS To Begin Wednesday At 6:37 P.M., PST

October 4, 2009 at 3:25 pm | Posted in 2009 NLDS vs. Cardinals, 2009 rules so far | Leave a comment

It has just been announced that game 1 between the Cardinals and the Dodgers will begin DodgersNLWest20092.jpgWednesday at 6:37 P.M., PST. 

For game 2, it’s still a bit iffy due to what the Yankees want to do.  The Yankees can choose either a 7 day or 8 day playoff schedule.  If they choose the former, game 2 will be on Thursday at 6:37 P.M., PST.  If they choose the 8 day schedule, it will be at 3:07 P.M., PST.  Here’s the rest of the schedule, but without the times: 

Game 3: LAD at STL, 3:07, PST, Saturday, October 10th. 

Game 4: LAD at STL, Sunday, October 11th. 

Game 5: STL at LA, Tuesday, October 13th. 

The games, in addition to all the rest of the LDS games, will be televised on TBS.  So because “Frank TV” exists no longer, get ready to want to bludgeon George Lopez… again! 

- Vin vinscully-face.jpg

FINALLY!! Your 2009 National League West Champions!!

October 3, 2009 at 10:35 pm | Posted in 2009 rules so far | 2 Comments

It took the team six tries, with the Trojans even winning more games during this span, and I think I also lost about 10 years of my life in that process, but they did it!  Clayton Kershaw made the Rockies’ offense look like little leaguers and continued to shut up the critics, tonight.  Kershaw stepped up and gave an amazing performance, going 6 IP, walking 3 and striking out 10, including striking out the first 5 hitters to begin the game.  He was practically Koufaxian for most of the game, as he shut down the hottest team in baseball.  Even better for him; this year, he can drink the bubbly! 

And, finally… FINALLY, it took 7 innings, but the offense awoke from their coma, scoring 5 in the 7th, and Broxton slamming the door.  The Dodgers clinch the NL West title for the second consecutive year (with it taking 10 more wins to do so), and home field advantage throughout the playoffs!  Time for St. Louis on Wednesday! 

But what the heck are you doing reading a blog, right now?  Go celebrate! 

KershawNLWestClincher2009.jpg

- Vin vinscully-face.jpg

This Is How Bad Things Are Right Now

October 3, 2009 at 8:13 am | Posted in 2009 rules so far | 6 Comments

Bill Plaschke wrote a negative article about the Dodgers this morning in the LA Times. Usually, I’d jump all over him for ignoring the Dodgers completely – just look at his Twitter feed, it’s been almost entirely USC since his last Dodger tweet on Sept 1 – and then jumping back in to dump on them just when things are going bad. It’s his style, and he’s a dick for doing it.

But today? I can’t even bring myself to do it. What could I possibly say to defend this team right now? Hiroki Kuroda’s hurt. Randy Wolf was mediocre last night. Chad Billingsley, who the hell knows. Manny sucks, and Andre Ethier’s nearly as bad.

It’s hardly completely hopeless, as some would paint it. Joe Torre’s 2000 Yankees coasted into the playoffs on a brutal 3-15 run, and still managed to take the Series. But I’m going to go so far as to say, the entire fate of the season hangs on tonight’s game. Clayton Kershaw’s looked healthy in his stints since returning from his shoulder injury, and Jorge De la Rosa’s 16-9 record is completely misleading, as he’s got a 4.45 ERA and has been pounded by the Dodgers this year.

If Kershaw can get them the win tonight, they can go into tomorrow’s game with at least a chance to breathe and celebrate in front of the home crowd. If they don’t win tonight? Then all that stands between them and an epic collapse is Vicente Padilla, and absolutely no good can come of that.

One other thing, though. Manny’s horrible right now, and I don’t argue that. 4 K’s last night is about as bad as it gets. But can we – and by “we”, I’m clearly talking about most journalists – stop pretending that he’s the only problem? Everyone is playing poorly. Not just him. 

I Guess We Don’t Have to Worry About Billingsley Starting in the Playoffs…

October 2, 2009 at 6:53 pm | Posted in Hiroki Kuroda | 6 Comments

Because Hiroki Kuroda’s not going to be joining us. TBLA with the scoop:

Phil Gurnee is at the park tonight, and he just reported that Hiroki Kuroda is out for the first round of the playoffs.  Joe Torre announced that “Kuroda has a small herniation of his cervical spine,” but no surgery will be needed.

Jon Garland will almost certainly get the start, now.

Man, this season certainly is heading to crap at a high speed, isn’t it?

Can we please win tonight’s game and get this over with? Please?

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,051 other followers