Andre Ethier Out With Jammed Finger

May 15, 2010 at 8:26 pm | Posted in Andre Ethier | 7 Comments

According to basically my entire Twitter feed, Andre Ethier took a BP pitch off his pinky, serious enough that he’s out of the lineup with Garret Anderson taking over in RF. If there’s been a bigger step down in big league history, I can’t think of one. And as the previews are starting, thus ends my first and hopefully last post from a movie theater.

Joe Torre Doesn’t Understand Irony

May 13, 2010 at 4:18 pm | Posted in Joe Torre, John Ely | 22 Comments

Since the team is 8-3 in July May and just swept Arizona, I won’t get overly negative. Still, I couldn’t help but chuckle at Joe Torre’s quote about how John Ely’s done well for the team:

“He’s one of our starters right now,” Torre said after Ely pitched six-plus innings. “[Vicente] Padilla is more than a month away. I don’t see where he’s [Ely] in any danger.” [...]

“His command has been terrific,” said Torre. “He makes it look — I don’t want to say easy — but simple. And that’s the thing that’s been escaping our club — getting deep into the game. He’s got us to the seventh inning each time.”  (via Sons of Steve Garvey)

Hey, don’t get me wrong; Ely’s been great. But read that last line of Torre’s quote again. He sure does seem to place a lot of importance on a starter getting to the seventh inning, doesn’t he? I’d completely agree with that stance as well… if Joe Torre were not also the one making sure other starters don’t get into the seventh. For example, what I said after Chad Billingsley’s start on Monday:

I love that Chad Billingsley was able to pull it together and get the win after his rough first inning the last time out. But he was clearly upset when leaving the mound, and I don’t blame him. He’d thrown only 90 innings, and while he certainly wasn’t Kershaw-level dominant, he was also up 4-1 when he left. Yes, he had put two men on base. But when you hear nonstop that Billingsley never works into the 7th inning… well, it’s pretty hard to do that when Torre apparently requires a no-hitter to be active before letting Billingsley get that far.

Which was nicely echoed by Eric Stephen at True Blue LA:

The narrative about Chad is one of the poor second half pitcher last season, not of his two solid years of performance prior to that.  That narrative will never change if Billingsley is not given the opportunity to change it.  If there was ever a time to let Billingsley work out of a tough spot — three run lead, well rested arm, an extra day of rest pending — this was it.  Part of Billingsley pitching into the seventh is his manager giving him a chance.

Torre has stated on several occasions that he has confidence in Billingsley.  It would be nice if he backs up those words with actions.

Well played, Joe.

*****

Hey, didn’t someone comment here a while back that they wanted to know when I’d get some ads so they could click on them relentlessly? There’s now one for Sports Interaction on the right sidebar. Click away!

It Doesn’t Have to Be This Way, You Know

May 12, 2010 at 8:10 pm | Posted in Garret Anderson, Hank Blalock, Tim Redding | 10 Comments

Apparently I’ve just got a thing with veteran lefty outfielders who wear #9, because I’ve done nothing but bash Garret Anderson all season long. It’s nothing personal, of course. He had a long and distinguished career with the Angels, but at some point you just have to admit it’s over. And when you’re featured in a block calling your your stats and praying for your release – seriously, just look at the numbers up there in the upper right – it’s over.

That said, my preferred replacement is Xavier Paul, who’s a far superior baserunner and defender who showed some nice offensive skill in his time in the bigs. While I don’t necessarily agree, there are those who say that he should be playing every day in AAA rather than part-time in MLB. Since I think he’d get plenty of time as Manny’s caddy and since I don’t think the Dodgers are really grooming him to be a starter anyway, it’s not something that concerns me.

Yet, if you do consider that a valid reason to keep Paul down, it’s not a zero-sum game. The choice is not simply between Anderson and Paul; there’s other options here, ones that could help the team immediately. Options like…

Hank Blalock. After not finding a job in the offseason, Blalock signed a minor-league deal with the Rays and has been crushing minor-league pitching: .366/.425/.535. If Blalock isn’t recalled by May 15th, he’s able to opt out and become a free agent, though there’s still a chance Tampa just eats what’s left on the $9m Pat Burrell’s owed this year to go with Blalock. If this sounds familiar to you, it’s because I said the Dodgers should have signed Blalock themselves back on April 2nd:

You can pick up Blalock – who’s still only 29, and whose top comparable at baseball-reference is actually Casey Blake – for absolutely nothing. Blalock’s got a lot working against him, I admit. But if you realize what he can do very well (crush righties), and don’t put him in the situations he’s terrible at (hitting lefties or wearing a glove) more than you absolutely have to, he can be a fantastically undervalued pickup for a team who desperately needs one. If that means having to cut ties with Nick Green, Garret Anderson, or Ronnie Belliard, then so be it.

And all Blalock’s done since then is prove that he can still hit, even surprisingly hitting lefties harder than righties with a crazy .522/.560/.870 line, though of course in a very small sample size of just 23 at-bats. There’s no question that he’s a far superior (and nine years younger!) player than Anderson right now, and he can even spell Casey Blake and James Loney at the corners, sparing you from having to see Ronnie Belliard there. Granted, this would leave you with only four outfielders, but since Matt Kemp and Andre Ethier play basically every day anyway, you could get by with just Reed Johnson. You can always toss Jamey Carroll out there in case of emergency, and Albuquerque’s just a few hours away.

If Blalock would cost more now than he would have six weeks ago, you can just consider that the cost of not making this move when it should have been done in the first place. Besides, no cost is too high to not have to watch Anderson and his osteoporosis out there any more, right? It’s known the Rays are looking for a right-handed reliever… I’m sure the Dodgers have a spare Ortiz to send.

**********

Completely unrelated, but in case you’re hoping the Dodgers are going to go out and acquire a pitcher, just know that these are the types of guys they’re going to be in on:

Tim Redding agreed to a minor league deal with the Yankees, according to Troy Renck of the Denver Post (via Twitter). The Dodgers and multiple Korean teams also expressed interest in Redding, who was released by the Rockies this morning.

That would be the same Tim Redding who was just flat-out release from Colorado’s AAA affiliate after allowing 12.2 hits per 9 innings this year. Of course they were interested.

John Ely Could Be Just What the Dodgers Need

May 12, 2010 at 9:45 am | Posted in Garret Anderson, John Ely | 16 Comments

Okay, let’s not get too excited. John Ely’s been up for just three starts, the first one mediocre, sandwiched around a fake demotion to the minors. He was never seen as a top prospect in the minors, and even in the bigs his fastball is averaging just 87.2 MPH. Right-handers, with incredibly rare exceptions (think Greg Maddux), don’t tend to get by with such low velocity unless they’re bringing something gimmicky to the table like a knuckleball. Even in the minors, he was never a big strikeout guy, whiffing 7.2/9 in AA last year despite going 14-2. If you’re only striking out 7 per 9 in Double-A, that doesn’t tend to translate well to the majors.

Still, on this staff, at this time, Ely may have found a home because of the one thing he’s extremely good at: getting the ball over the plate. Look at the rest of the Dodger staff. Clayton Kershaw and Chad Billingsley have many times the natural “stuff” that Ely does, but each has had their share of control problems – particularly Kershaw, walking an untenable 6.3/9. Then you’ve got (okay, had) Charlie Haeger, who lost his job thanks to walking 7.7/9, and in the bullpen, Ramon Troncoso, Ramon Ortiz, George Sherrill, Ronald Belisario, Jeff Weaver, Russ Ortiz, and Jon Link all have or had BB/9 rates north of 4 (though some clearly in small sample sizes). Even Hiroki Kuroda, known for his control, has seen his walk rate rise from 1.8 last year to 2.7 this year – still good, of course, but not an improvement.

The point is, as a whole the Dodgers have the fifth highest rate of free passes in all of baseball, and that’s only because one of the teams worse than them – the Mets – employs Oliver Perez. So in steps Ely, and in his 18.1 MLB innings, he’s walked just two (yes, the number is actually three, but one was intentional), and all came in that first game in cold, windy New York. In his last two games, he’s struck out thirteen and walked zero. For a team that’s been watching its pitchers put men on base for free all year, this, friends, is a welcome sight, and it’s a large part of how he was able to outduel Dan Haren last night, despite Haren getting his first nine outs via the K. Be sure to temper your expectations, of course – he’s not going to beat guys like Haren every time out, that’s for sure – but on a team dying for any glimmer of pitching hope, he’s providing at least a small spark. Finally – and I promise I won’t harp on this all season – Juan Pierre, whom Ely was traded for along with Jon Link, is hitting .244 with one extra base hit for the White Sox. Where are all the fans who thought trading him was a massive mistake now?

On the other side of the ball, how awesome is it that Andre Ethier can hit two doubles with an RBI, and it’s almost par for the course? His OPS is now up to 1.175, which is just inhuman. But it wasn’t just him; James Loney had four hits, including a homer. Manny got on base four times as well, and Russell Martin, Ronnie Belliard, and even Jamey Carroll all chipped in with two hits. When this offense is humming, it’s a sight to see.

Of course, not every hit is a productive one. Garret Anderson finally got on the board with a single, and even though it was just a grounder to the right side that got through off a pitcher with a 9.00 ERA this year, Joe Torre and Ned Colletti were sure to latch on to it and make all the excuses in the world. Such as…

Before the game:

Joe Torre told reporters today that if Garret Anderson were “sitting in the other dugout, he’d scare me coming off the bench.” (via DodgerThoughts)

and after the game:

“I see a player struggling to adjust to a new role,” general manager Ned Colletti said. “One at-bat five times a week, it’s very tough.”

Said manager Joe Torre: “We’re trying to get him as many at-bats to make it easier on him. I see a timing thing. Is he the same player he was at one time? No. But he comes out of the dugout with a couple men on base and he’ll scare the heck out of me. That’s a big part of having him as a weapon.” (via dodgers.com)

Sigh. How are you making excuses for this guy, while calling out Matt Kemp, and making no mention of the ridiculously bad offseason they put together? (edit: I see Chad at MOKM basically said the exact same thing. That makes it double-true.) Anderson’s been so bad that even Steve Dilbeck at the LA Times blog ran a piece just collecting all the negative comments about him on the internet (I made it, hooray!), yet Torre and Colletti are really going to try to convince us that a 38-year-old guy with 7 hits on the year, hitting .137/.167/.216, and offering no value on defense or on the bases just needs more time? What is it going to take to put this horse out to pasture?

Chad Billingsley Is Not a Child

May 11, 2010 at 1:03 am | Posted in Andre Ethier, Chad Billingsley, Garret Anderson, Joe Torre, Ramon Troncoso | 35 Comments

Full disclosure: I spent most of tonight out sharing drinks with some friends, old and new, from Baseball Prospectus, Heater Magazine, and elsewhere, so I only caught the last two innings of tonight’s game. With it pushing 1am here in the East and work looming in the morning, it’s time to turn to every blogger’s favorite crutch: the lightning round.

I’m running out of adjectives to describe Andre Ethier. After three more hits and two RBI, he’s now up to .393/.452/.732. He’s leading all of baseball in batting average, slugging percentage, and OPS, and by quite a bit. We’re getting far enough into the season to almost consider this less of a “hot streak” and more of a “damned good player having a career year.” Of course, every hit increases the chance that the Dodgers won’t be able to afford him when he hits free agency after next year 2012. Hooray? Still, that’s a worry for another time, because what Ethier’s doing right now is historic, at least in Dodger terms.

Is this the most depressing seven-of-ten winning streak ever? A 70% clip will get you pretty far in baseball, but I’ll be damned if it feels that way. Then again, that’s what happens when you don’t know who’s starting the next night’s game half the time and those three losses have all been thanks to absolute disaster starts. While I think the negativity around here is well deserved, I also think it’s important to realize that this team is playing awfully, yet is still coming up with wins. Should they ever be able to put it all together at once, you might yet see something special.

What the hell is Joe Torre’s deal, part one? I love that Chad Billingsley was able to pull it together and get the win after his rough first inning the last time out. But he was clearly upset when leaving the mound, and I don’t blame him. He’d thrown only 90 innings, and while he certainly wasn’t Kershaw-level dominant, he was also up 4-1 when he left. Yes, he had put two men on base. But when you hear nonstop that Billingsley never works into the 7th inning… well, it’s pretty hard to do that when Torre apparently requires a no-hitter to be active before letting Billingsley get that far.

Garret Anderson may actually be dead. After another weak out today, his line is .122/.154/.204. That’s a .358 OPS. His OPS is almost 40 points lower than Ethier’s batting average. Can we please, please, please cut the cord already?

What the hell is Joe Torre’s deal, part two? Jonathan Broxton began warming in the 8th inning, with the Dodgers up 4-2. Fine. Yet the Dodgers put up 3 in the top of the 9th after RBI hits by Loney, Blake, and DeWitt, so Broxton sat down. Also fine. Yet with a five-run lead, who comes in? Not George Sherrill, who’s been horrible. Not Carlos Monasterios, who for all his success is still a Rule 5 pick. No, Torre inserts Ramon Troncoso, now on pace for over 90 games this year. I can’t even begin to explain how boned this team is if Troncoso, the most vital non-Broxton reliever, breaks down, so you’d think you’d want to save him for important situations. But wait! This gets better. Troncoso walked Chris Young, and then gave up an RBI single to Rusty Ryal… which gets Torre to warm Broxton up again.

Troncoso, of course, got the final three outs in the next two batters thanks to a strikeout and a game-ending double play. So Torre managed to work out both of his best relievers… in a five-run game. All this, while guys who practically have middle names of “put me in only in five-run games” sat and watched.

You’ve probably seen the stories floating around recently that say if the McCourt situation doesn’t get sorted out, Torre may not want to come back. Are we sure that’s such a bad thing?

Rules? We Don’t Need No Stinking Rules

May 10, 2010 at 1:47 pm | Posted in Charlie Haeger, John Ely | 12 Comments

We’ve all been theorizing for some time now that the Dodgers would do their best to circumvent the “you can’t recall a player you optioned to the minors for 10 days rule” by inventing some sort of injury to a poorly-performing pitcher, in order to recall John Ely to start in Arizona on Tuesday. There’s really no other way around it; it’s the only viable option.

Well, now it’s left the domain of bloggy conspiracy theories, as USA Today‘s Bob Nightengale has somewhat confirmed it:

The Dodgers have quietly decided to start John Ely, who was sent to the minors last week, on Tuesday against the D-backs.

Of course, Nightengale makes no mention of the corresponding roster move. Remember, though, you can break the “10 day” rule only in case of an injury, not because a roster spot opens up due to someone getting cut, optioned, or traded. So while you can speculate on who that’s going to be… we all know it’ll be Charlie Haeger, who miraculously came down with a “bruised heel” after getting precisely zero outs against the Rockies on Saturday. What fortuitous timing!

Seriously, I have to wonder. Even though it was obviously the right move for the Dodgers to do whatever they could to get Ely back up, how much more glaring does the rule-bending need to be before MLB notices?

*Dr. Nick joke brought to you by commenter EephusBlue, whose noble spirit has embiggened this blog.

Clayton Kershaw’s Just That Good

May 9, 2010 at 6:58 pm | Posted in Clayton Kershaw | 6 Comments

About 10 minutes after the game started today, the world was about to spin off its axis. After a completely horrendous run of starting pitching, the Dodgers desperately needed a quality start from someone, not only just to get a win, but to calm the storm building around the team if just for a day. Clayton Kershaw needed a good outing as well, if only to erase the taste of last week’s train wreck against the Brewers in which he didn’t get out of the second inning.

Despite all that, just 10 minutes into the afternoon, the wheels looked like they’d be falling off again. Colorado leadoff man Eric Young, Jr. popped out to first, and then Dexter Fowler walked. After Todd Helton struck out (and I’m pretty sure “Todd Helton’s not as good as he was” has replaced “Todd Helton was once Peyton Manning’s backup quarterback in college” as Vin Scully’s Helton go-to story of choice), Troy Tulowitzki bunted for a hit. Then Ryan Spilborghs walked, and after starting off Ian Stewart 0-2, Kershaw delivered three straight balls to make it a full count.

At this point, Kershaw had already delivered 29 pitches in the inning. With the way things have gone lately, and with Stewart slugging .542, we could be forgiven for expecting that the next pitch would either be a ball, walking in a run, or for Stewart to reach out and poke a double into the gap, scoring two or even three. Even if Kershaw managed to work his way out of the situation, that kind of pitch “efficiency” meant you’d be seeing the bullpen, in all likelihood, by the 5th inning.

Yet Stewart watched the next pitch go by for a called strike 3, and the crisis was avoided. After 30 pitches in the first inning, Kershaw then needed just 77 pitches to breeze through the next 7 innings. And breeze he did; Kershaw’s Game Score of 84 is tied for the 9th highest of any game this season. In fact, he was so dominant that no Rockie even hit the ball out of the infield until Clint Barmes flew out to Matt Kemp to lead off the 8th. On the day, he struck out 9, and after allowing the 2 walks and a hit in the first inning, he allowed just one more of each for the rest of the day – even getting one back when he picked Young off first base.

The point here isn’t to suggest that Kershaw’s gem absolves the team from their problems; it doesn’t. (Even if Russell Martin’s homer means I’m going to have to hold on to that “Martin is just as bad as last year” piece for a day or two.) It’s just that we all know this is the kind of performance he’s capable of, that it shouldn’t be seen as a miracle that he can outduel the man who’s possibly the best pitcher in the NL right now, Ubaldo Jimenez. It just means that when he does have a terrible start like last week, we’re not being homers at all when we laugh at national journalists like Jon Heyman when he says things like “Kershaw is regressing” and that Brad Penny might be better.

On the right days, no one is better than Kershaw. And since he’s still just 22, the idea is that he’ll have plenty more “right days” than “bad days” in the years to come. So we can just let him, please?

Charlie Haeger’s Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day

May 9, 2010 at 10:50 am | Posted in Charlie Haeger | 19 Comments

Has there ever been a worse week of starting pitching in Dodger history? I’m not even sure how I’d go about researching something like that, but in the last week we’ve seen Clayton Kershaw not get out of the 2nd, Chad Billingsley allowing four runs in the 1st, Hiroki Kuroda allowing 14 baserunners in 5.1 IP, and then last night Charlie Haeger got as many Rockies out as I did – zero. If not for John Ely’s sparkling turn on Thursday, this trip through the rotation would have been a complete wash, and yet Ely was rewarded for that with a trip to AAA.

This team is in trouble, and they need to do something about it, now. After today’s game, I’ll be back with the moves that need to be made before the clock strikes midnight tonight, not only to get better players on the team but also to send a message that this kind of performance is just unacceptable. But feel free to post your own ideas in the comments first.

I Don’t Know Why These Things Surprise Me

May 8, 2010 at 10:07 am | Posted in Garret Anderson, John Ely, Ramon Ortiz, WTF?!, Xavier Paul | 26 Comments

I don’t want to ignore last night’s win, which for all the doom-and-gloom around here, was actually the 5th win in the last 7 games – despite a less than stellar outing from Hiroki Kuroda. Andre Ethier continues to be a destroyer of worlds, and Jonathan Broxton showed once again that he’ll do just fine if you actually let him pitch more than once a week. All well and good. It’s just that with Jeff Weaver (last night’s winner, despite throwing just 6 pitches) and Manny Ramirez coming off the disabled list, two players had to be removed to make room for them. And even though we all knew exactly what was going to happen – that it would be John Ely and Xavier Paul – the fact that it actually did go down this way is no less disappointing. To recap, this is what I said yesterday, in advance of either Weaver or Manny being activated:

Could it be that this is finally the end of Ramon Ortiz? A man can dream. Plus, Xavier Paul got on base three times last night and stole a base, while Garret Anderson flew out as a pinch-hitter. With Manny coming back this weekend as well… well, I won’t get my hopes up. Let’s just say, if I could get rid of both members of the “old guy DFA tracker” at the same time, life would be good.

Now let me be completely clear; I never in a million years thought that the right moves here (dumping Ramon Ortiz and Garret Anderson) would both happen. That’s just not the m.o. of this team. But after Ely’s 7K/0BB outing while taking a shutout into the 7th, and Paul’s outstanding productivity, it wasn’t too much to think that just one of these things could happen, right?

Let’s start with the more egregious offense, keeping Anderson over Paul. Garret Anderson, as you’ve read here so many times, is done. Cooked. Unplayable. I mean, I know it’s a small sample size, but his OPS+ is 4. Four. He’s got two hits in the last three weeks. In his last 30 plate appearances, he’s got 2 hits and 1 walk against 9 strikeouts. He offers zero value in the field, and he’s actually making me yearn for Mark Sweeney at the plate. Paul, on the other hand, has been outstanding. Since an 0-5 in his first game, he’s been killing it: .333/.385/.583, with 3 stolen bases and a strong arm in the outfield.

So what’s the rationale here? Sure, some would say that Paul needs to play every day in the minors, but I disagree. This isn’t a raw prospect like Dee Gordon or Trayvon Robinson here. Paul’s 25 years old, and no one expects him to take over a starting job next year. His ceiling with the Dodgers is likely as a 4th outfielder anyway, so why not let him do it right now? No, the reason is something much more ridiculous: Joe Torre liked Anderson’s RBI single the other night.

“Hopefully that gets him started,” said Manager Joe Torre. “That was a nice situation for him. That’s the experience he showed you there. Not trying to do too much, just serving the ball the other way.”

That single, by the way, was a softly hit ball up the middle that scored a run in a game the Dodgers would lose 11-3. It’s not that I didn’t see this coming; immediately after I wrote on Twitter:

I’m happy that Garret Anderson just put an RBI on the board for the Dodgers, but less so that the hit probably bought him another month.

And… that’s exactly what’s happened. With the start the Dodgers are off to, every game counts even more. And the Dodgers chose to keep the far, far inferior player just because he’s got creamy veteran goodness. Or pictures of Joe Torre abusing a horse, I don’t know.

On the pitching side, choosing Ortiz over Ely isn’t quite as bad, but it’s still pretty terrible. You could make the case that since Ely had just started, you’d prefer to have an extra arm in the pen for the next few days. Which is fine, but what it now means is that (since Ely can’t be recalled for 10 days unless another pitcher goes on the DL), Ely’s Tuesday start will have to be taken by Carlos Monasterios (with Ortiz probably backing him up)… thus depleting your bullpen anyway. I’m not saying Ely’s the next big thing – he’s hardly a top prospect – but of his 13 innings this year, 10 have been scoreless. His last start was arguably the best one the Dodgers have seen in two weeks, and this is a team desperate for pitching.

So you send Ely down in order to hang onto Ramon Ortiz… who’s got a 5.71 ERA. And a 1.327 WHIP. And a 4.2 BB/9 and 6.2 K/9, neither of which are great . He’s allowed a run in 7 of his 12 appearances this year, including a homer in his last outing. He’s not getting better. He’s a failed experiment, just like Anderson. Yet, he remains while a superior younger player goes down.

There’s no shortage of blame for the Dodgers terrible season so far this year, as we’ve seen, and a fair share of it goes to underperforming players. Let’s just not forget these indefensible roster decisions, because the Dodgers are choosing to not go with the best 25-man-roster they have available, for reasons known only to them.

Update: Josh S., in the comments, points out Paul’s reaction to being sent down:

“I don’t fit here right now, that’s it,” Paul said after being consoled by teammates Casey Blake and Matt Kemp. “Right now, I just don’t cut it here.”

Paul said he was told by general manager Ned Colletti to work on his mental approach to the game “and being a big leaguer.”

So as if being sent down for a player who’s clearly worse than he is wasn’t bad enough, that’s the feedback he gets from the team after doing basically everything right. Disgusting.

Let’s Not Forget the Bright Spots

May 7, 2010 at 9:59 am | Posted in Andre Ethier, John Ely | 20 Comments

Let’s face it: this season has been nothing short of a disaster so far. The things we all thought would go wrong (weak starting pitching, lousy bench, existence of Garret Anderson) have indeed gone wrong. But it’s been far more than just that – and Jon Weisman at Dodger Thoughts has an extremely detailed and worthwhile look at exactly this subject – because even the things we thought would go right, like a solid bullpen and decent defense, have gone wrong as well.

So after Clayton Kershaw and Chad Billingsley each got slapped around in the first two games of a disastrous series against the Brewers, if I told you that in the finale you’d be seeing the second career start of unheralded rookie John Ely (who gave up five runs to the Mets in his first start last week) followed by Jonathan Broxton blowing a rare save attempt, you’d probably have been wise to not even turn the game on.

Yet… as bad as things are, there’s still glimmers of hope, most of which can be found wearing #16 in right field, because Andre Ethier is simply outrageous right now. Last season’s run of walkoff hits was fun, but generally considered a statistical oddity, much like how Don Mattingly set the single-season record for grand slams in 1987, and never hit another one again. Yet for all the excitement about the five-tool athleticism of Matt Kemp (when we’re not harrassing him for his celebrity girlfriend or indifferent defense), Ethier’s the one who provides more excitement than any Dodger we’ve seen in years.

After he saved Broxton (and no, I’m not getting on Broxton here. Joe Torre pitches him once a week. What did you expect was going to happen?) with a walkoff grand slam, Ethier’s line is an unreal .371/.440/.722. A .722 slugging percentage! Not that I expect him to keep that up all year, but if he did, that would tie him for the 23rd highest mark in major league history. (And that moves up to 15th highest, if you don’t respect the work of Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa, and Mark McGwire.)

Seriously, look at the NL leaderboard right now for the Triple Crown categories, and remember that this is a league with guys like Albert Pujols, Prince Fielder, and Hanley Ramirez:

And that really could be his face on all three of those, because he’s tied with Kelly Johnson for the home run lead, and “Arizona” just comes before “Los Angeles” in alphabetical order. 

But what’s really impressive is that – at least over the first month plus – Ethier has solved his biggest problem from previous years, and that was his complete inability to hit lefties:

2006: .842 vs RH, .846 vs LH
2007: .830 vs RH, .816 vs LH
2008: .953 vs RH, .692 vs LH
2009: .960 vs RH, .629 vs LH

Granted, 9 of his 10 homers in 2010 have come against righties, but he’s still got a line of .387/.457/.581 against his fellow southpaws. If he’s truly figured it out, and no longer needs to be strategically kept away from lefties, then he’s ascended from “damn good player” to “legitimate superstar”. It gets better – last year he struck out 116 times against 72 walks, which is still pretty good as far as power hitters go. This year, that’s an even 11 of each, and he’s on pace for 62 homers and 185 RBI. I wouldn’t be too disappointed if he doesn’t quite reach those historic heights, but we could be looking at one of the greatest offensive years in Dodger history right here.

I don’t want to let Ethier’s heroics completely overshadow Ely’s performance, either  – taking a scoreless game into the 7th, striking out 7 while walking zero is an amazing performance. (Even if he didn’t get the win, because… well, you know.) This does lead to an interesting situation, though. Most expected that Ely would get sent back to AAA when Jeff Weaver is activated this weekend. But how do you send him down now, after a performance like that, when the rotation is completely in shambles? There’s still a chance that Charlie Haeger gets the boot, but he’s already been named the Saturday starter, and even if he’s not in the rotation his ability to pitch for long stretches out of the bullpen is invaluable to a team like this. You could lose Carlos Monasterios, but he’s been impressive in his short time up.

Could it be that this is finally the end of Ramon Ortiz? A man can dream. Plus, Xavier Paul got on base three times last night and stole a base, while Garret Anderson flew out as a pinch-hitter. With Manny coming back this weekend as well… well, I won’t get my hopes up. Let’s just say, if I could get rid of both members of the “old guy DFA tracker” at the same time, life would be good.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,125 other followers